Re: AMD or Intel?
- From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:59:08 +0200
--On fredag, september 14, 2007 18.44.35 -0400 Francisco Reyes <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Palle Girgensohn writes:
Sorry, my mistake, more like a percent per day at the moment...
If you have 16GB and you got 1% per day.. in less than 100 days you would
be at 32GB.. If growth continues you will theoretically be at 60GB+
within a year.
> We are planning about 16 GB RAM, actually. Maybe it is overkill?
If you can afford it the more the merrier.. given that you likely will
have this machine for a good couple of years.. as your data grow what was
once "overkill" will become "a good amount" of memory. So I would say do
get the 16GB if the budget allows it.
True...
> We will probably go for SCSI. HP DL380 with "HP SmartArray", aka ciss.
How will you monitor disk failures? Does that controller can be monitored
with FreeBSD in some way?
I believe it can, not sure how well, though. Status control can be done with this util:
/usr/ports/sysutils/cciss_vol_status <http://cciss.sourceforge.net/>
Thanks
Palle
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- AMD or Intel?
- From: Palle Girgensohn
- Re: AMD or Intel?
- From: Francisco Reyes
- Re: AMD or Intel?
- From: Palle Girgensohn
- Re: AMD or Intel?
- From: Francisco Reyes
- Re: AMD or Intel?
- From: Palle Girgensohn
- Re: AMD or Intel?
- From: Francisco Reyes
- AMD or Intel?
- Prev by Date: Re: Massive performance loss from OS::sleep hack
- Next by Date: Re: Massive performance loss from OS::sleep hack
- Previous by thread: Re: AMD or Intel?
- Next by thread: Re: AMD or Intel?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|