Re: AMD or Intel?
- From: "Claus Guttesen" <kometen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:57:31 +0200
I think this is not current information; the new woodcrest
architecture performs mucg better, although this is deduced from
this thread's discussion...
Except this thread has largely glossed over the importance of memory
bandwidth, which is exactly the reason why Opterons have been beating
Xeons for several years. Last I'd heard, things were fairly close
between the two, but that would matter on how many cores and physical
CPUs you have.
It would be good if someone could do a database benchmark for some of
the larger parts.
Like this one??? http://tweakers.net/reviews/657/6
Related links has been mentioned before. Opterons does perform well,
especially compared to the first and second generation xeon's. But
when woodcrest and clowertown were introduced opteron was more or less
left behind. Maby AMD's new barcelona will change the picture.
--
regards
Claus
When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom,
the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner.
Shakespeare
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- AMD or Intel?
- From: Palle Girgensohn
- Re: AMD or Intel?
- From: Francisco Reyes
- Re: AMD or Intel?
- From: Palle Girgensohn
- Re: AMD or Intel?
- From: Decibel!
- AMD or Intel?
- Prev by Date: Re: AMD or Intel?
- Next by Date: Re: AMD or Intel?
- Previous by thread: Re: AMD or Intel?
- Next by thread: Re: AMD or Intel?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|