Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7

On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Josh Carroll wrote:

buildworld isn't cooperating for me, but once I iron that out, I'll
post some results there as well :)

I was able to get buildworld compiling ok and here are the results:

4BSD ULE.13 ULE.7
13:24.73 13:44.28 13:38.85

Only a 1.75% difference when the slice value is set to 7.


What was the -j value and number of processors?

If anyone has suggestions for other benchmarks to run for different
workloads to test, let me know and I'd be happy to run it for the
above 3 configurations.

Josh

_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Relevant Pages

  • Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
    ... I was able to get buildworld compiling ok and here are the results: ... Only a 1.75% difference when the slice value is set to 7. ... workloads to test, let me know and I'd be happy to run it for the ... above 3 configurations. ...
    (freebsd-performance)
  • Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
    ... On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Josh Carroll wrote: ... slice_min and slice both equal to 7 and see if the numbers come out ... patch from the other changes. ... cpu = ffs; ...
    (freebsd-performance)