Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: "Josh Carroll" <josh.carroll@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 17:24:42 -0800
That's expected due to the fuzzy rounding of 128 / 10, etc. Can you set
slice_min and slice both equal to 7 and see if the numbers come out
better than without the patch but with a slice value of 7? Basically I'm
trying to isolate the effects of the different slice handling in this
patch from the other changes.
So are you expecting the same performance out of this patch with
slice_min and slice set to 7 as I was seeing without the patch with
the slice value set to 7? I'll get the benchmarks running now with
those settings, and report back soon.
Josh
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Jeff Roberson
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Josh Carroll
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Jeff Roberson
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Josh Carroll
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Jeff Roberson
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Josh Carroll
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Jeff Roberson
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Josh Carroll
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Jeff Roberson
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- Prev by Date: Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- Next by Date: Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- Previous by thread: Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- Next by thread: Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
