Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: "Josh Carroll" <josh.carroll@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 15:18:23 -0500
BTW, it doesn't make much sense to be measuring to millisecond precision
a quantity which has variation that is unknown but probably much larger
:) When trying to make comparisons to identify performance changes, a
careful statistical approach is necessary.
Try the /usr/src/tools/tools/ministat utility for a simple and effective
way to compare these kinds of noisy measurements and extract reliable
comparisons.
Thanks Kris! I have been taking an average of 3 values, but this looks
extremely useful. I'll go ahead and build the necessary input files
for ministat for stock 4BSD and stock ULE from RELENG_7, so I can
generate something like the ministat README for future benchmark runs.
I'll also increase my number of runs to 5 to provide a better
statistical set of data. Appreciate the pointer, I wasn't aware of
ministat. :)
Thanks!
Josh
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Josh Carroll
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Jeff Roberson
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Josh Carroll
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Jeff Roberson
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Josh Carroll
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Jeff Roberson
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Josh Carroll
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Josh Carroll
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- Prev by Date: Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- Next by Date: Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- Previous by thread: Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- Next by thread: Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- Index(es):