Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: "Josh Carroll" <josh.carroll@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:35:47 -0500
These ministat results show that the latest patch (alone) results in
slightly worse performance for ffmpeg and buildworld, but slightly
better results for sysbench.
Please disregard those conclusions, I misread the ffmpeg results and
didn't look at all thread counts for the sysbench runs.
Looking more closely, the latest ULE patch improves ffmpeg performance
slightly but degrades buildworld performance slightly.
As for sysbench, the new patch takes a hit with 4 threads (1 per
core), but is better with 8 threads (2 per core). It's slightly better
at 12 threads (3 per core) and 16 threads (4 per core).
Thanks,
Josh
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Jeff Roberson
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Josh Carroll
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Jeff Roberson
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Josh Carroll
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Jeff Roberson
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Josh Carroll
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Josh Carroll
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Josh Carroll
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- Prev by Date: Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- Next by Date: Optimal Apache22 configuration
- Previous by thread: Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- Next by thread: Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- Index(es):