Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Julian Elischer <julian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 16:46:27 -0800
Josh Carroll wrote:
is bigger better or worse?
For sysbench bigger is better (more transactions per second). For
ffmpeg, lower is better - e.g. the time to transcode the first 120
seconds of the selected video is less, so it ran faster.
don't forget to give this info when giving numbers :-)
Josh
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Josh Carroll
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Josh Carroll
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Julian Elischer
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- From: Josh Carroll
- Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- Prev by Date: Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- Next by Date: Re: mysql scaling questions
- Previous by thread: Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|