Re: network performance
- From: Stefan Lambrev <stefan.lambrev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:28:39 +0200
Greetings,
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Stefan Lambrev wrote:net.isr2.direct=1 have very bad impact over performance.Greetings,
Kris Kennaway wrote:Yes, it is gone with 8.0. Disable the module builds because some of them like this one probably need compile fixes. If you need a subset of modules use MODULES_OVERRIDE=list (in /etc/make.conf)Yes, kernel builds.
I'm still playing with it, but the first results shows that new kernel can handle 800k incoming packets (well may be more but I have not enough power right now to generate more packets).
It still answer only to 250K-260K. I guess I'm hitting the limitation of syncache/syncookies ?
Yes, it could be. You may need to tune the net.inet.tcp.syncache parameters to get better performance. That is good news though.
Anyway this netisr2 looks like huge improvement :)
Actually I forgot to mention: you probably want to set net.isr2.direct=1.
When I set it to 1 the server cannot handle more then 230kpps which is worse then vanilla 7.0 :)
Do you want to see lock profiling and hwpmc output when enabled?
Btw from where I can check if malloc() debugging is enabled, as I want to be sure that no debugging is slowing down the tests?
Does `ln -s aj /etc/malloc.conf` disable malloc() dubug?
--
Best Wishes,
Stefan Lambrev
ICQ# 24134177
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: network performance
- From: Stefan Lambrev
- Re: network performance
- References:
- Re: network performance
- From: gnn
- Re: network performance
- From: Stefan Lambrev
- Re: network performance
- From: Stefan Lambrev
- Re: network performance
- From: Andrew Thompson
- Re: network performance
- From: Stefan Lambrev
- Re: network performance
- From: Stefan Lambrev
- Re: network performance
- From: Stefan Lambrev
- Re: network performance
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: network performance
- From: Stefan Lambrev
- Re: network performance
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: network performance
- From: Stefan Lambrev
- Re: network performance
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: network performance
- From: Stefan Lambrev
- Re: network performance
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: network performance
- From: Stefan Lambrev
- Re: network performance
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: network performance
- Prev by Date: Re: network performance
- Next by Date: Re: network performance
- Previous by thread: Re: network performance
- Next by thread: Re: network performance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|