Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- From: Kris Kennaway <kris@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:44:22 +0100
Brett Bump wrote:
I've changed the order of php extensions, disabled autonegotiation,
moved mail queues and large volume directory folders to separate
drives and set noatime. Nothing seems to make much of an impact.
My next idea was to setup my kernel for device_polling, but none of
this is really diagnosing what the real problem is. Any clues?
We are going to need more information about your system. What do you mean by "peak activity"? What is running on the system when it performs badly (check top -S, ps, gstat, vmstat -w, vmstat -i). What is your kernel configuration, dmesg and relevant aspects of the system configuration?
Kris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- From: Brett Bump
- Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- References:
- System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- From: Brett Bump
- System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- Prev by Date: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- Next by Date: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- Previous by thread: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- Next by thread: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|