Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- From: Bill Moran <wmoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:16:14 -0500
In response to Brett Bump <bbump@xxxxxxxx>:
I'm seeing signal 6's on apache and imapd (never happened before)
network errors, serious response time errors and generally poor
performance during peak activity (same box, same people).
IIRC, signal 6 is an indicator that you've compiled binaries that are
almost, but not quite compatible with your CPU.
If this machine has been 4.X for a while, it's probably old hardware.
Make sure you're using the correct CPU definition in your kernel
config and in your make configuration.
What _is_ the hardware?
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
wmoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- References:
- System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- From: Brett Bump
- System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- Prev by Date: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- Next by Date: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- Previous by thread: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- Next by thread: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- Index(es):