Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- From: Brett Bump <bbump@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:02:44 -0700 (MST)
Oops!
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c: In function `chkdq':
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:168: error: `do_check' undeclared (first use in this function)
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:168: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:168: error: for each function it appears in.)
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:174: error: `warn' undeclared (first use in this function)
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:178: error: too many arguments to function `chkdqchg'
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c: In function `chkdqchg':
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:230: error: number of arguments doesn't match prototype
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:75: error: prototype declaration
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c: In function `chkiq':
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:330: error: too many arguments to function `chkiqchg'
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c: In function `chkiqchg':
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:412: error: `warn' undeclared (first use in this function)
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c: In function `quotaon':
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:522: warning: implicit declaration of function `quotaoff1'
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:522: warning: nested extern declaration of `quotaoff1'
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:583: warning: implicit declaration of function `quotaoff_inchange'
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:583: warning: nested extern declaration of `quotaoff_inchange'
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c: At top level:
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:599: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:599: warning: static declaration of 'quotaoff1' follows non-static declaration
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:522: warning: previous implicit declaration of 'quotaoff1' was here
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:680: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c: In function `dqget':
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:1130: error: `vfslocked' undeclared (first use in this function)
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:1134: error: `dqvplocked' undeclared (first use in this function)
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:1054: warning: unused variable `td'
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c: At top level:
../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:1022: warning: 'dqhashfind' defined but not used
*** Error code 1
This was after applying the patch and disabling quotas.
Brett
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Brett Bump wrote:_______________________________________________
Possilby the weekend project will be setting up the backup with 6.3 to
switch everything over to that.
The first thing you need to do is either disable quotas or apply the
patch (maybe in conjunction with the 6.3 upgrade). That *is* the cause
of at least some of your performance problems. If any issues remain,
then we can revisit once you have done that.
Kris
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- From: Kostik Belousov
- Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- References:
- System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- From: Brett Bump
- Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- From: Brett Bump
- Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- From: Brett Bump
- Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- From: Kris Kennaway
- System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- Prev by Date: Re: Bad performance of 7.0 nfs client with Solaris nfs server
- Next by Date: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- Previous by thread: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- Next by thread: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|