Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- From: Bill Moran <wmoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:21:36 -0500
In response to Ivan Voras <ivoras@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Brett Bump <bbump@xxxxxxxx>:
I'm seeing signal 6's on apache and imapd (never happened before)
network errors, serious response time errors and generally poor
performance during peak activity (same box, same people).
IIRC, signal 6 is an indicator that you've compiled binaries that are
almost, but not quite compatible with your CPU.
You probably mean signals 4 (SIGILL) or 10 (SIGBUS), rather than 6
(SIGABRT) :)
I was getting a lot of SIGABRTs once, but that turned out to be due to
PHP module order bogosity and linking mismatched threaded libraries into
apache.
You're quite likely correct.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
wmoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- From: Brett Bump
- Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- From: Bill Moran
- Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- From: Ivan Voras
- System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- Prev by Date: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- Next by Date: Re: Bad performance of 7.0 nfs client with Solaris nfs server
- Previous by thread: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
- Next by thread: Syncache / syncookies performance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|