Re: Bad performance of 7.0 nfs client with Solaris nfs server
- From: Kris Kennaway <kris@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:57:04 +0100
Valerio Daelli wrote:
As you can see they are much faster than NFS.What NFS parameters?
Then I have done a test with a Solaris 10 client and a Solaris 10 server:
---
SOLARIS
root@max 17:00:34:~ /usr/local/bin/iozone -r 2m -+q 1 -i 0 -n 2048 -g
8m -Raceb iozone.xls -f
/mnt/nest.ifom-ieo-campus.it/iozone.solaris/iozone.tmp
random
random bkwd record stride
KB reclen write rewrite read reread read
write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread
2048 2048 38507 38278
4096 2048 54309 63908
8192 2048 60082 69817
Kris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bad performance of 7.0 nfs client with Solaris nfs server
- From: Valerio Daelli
- Re: Bad performance of 7.0 nfs client with Solaris nfs server
- References:
- Re: Bad performance of 7.0 nfs client with Solaris nfs server
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: Bad performance of 7.0 nfs client with Solaris nfs server
- From: Valerio Daelli
- Re: Bad performance of 7.0 nfs client with Solaris nfs server
- From: Eric Anderson
- Re: Bad performance of 7.0 nfs client with Solaris nfs server
- From: Valerio Daelli
- Re: Bad performance of 7.0 nfs client with Solaris nfs server
- Prev by Date: Re: Bad performance of 7.0 nfs client with Solaris nfs server
- Next by Date: Re: Bad performance of 7.0 nfs client with Solaris nfs server
- Previous by thread: Re: Bad performance of 7.0 nfs client with Solaris nfs server
- Next by thread: Re: Bad performance of 7.0 nfs client with Solaris nfs server
- Index(es):