Re: ZFS, Dell PE2950
- From: "Benjeman J. Meekhof" <bmeekhof@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:35:55 -0400
I have some old dd numbers from when I was experimenting to find a UFS/gstripe combination that wasn't horrifyingly slow to read. I was not then adjusting filesystem blocksize, and not until moving UFS2 bs to the maximum did initial results seem worth resuming iozone tests. Raid HW stripe-width is 128k. FWIW.
# using 4k stripe, same as above
#gstripe label -v -s 4k test /dev/mfid0 /dev/mfid2
#newfs -U /dev/stripe/test
#time dd if=/dev/zero of=/test/deletafile bs=1M count=10240
#time dd if=/test/deletafile of=/dev/null bs=1M count=10240
#write: 26.5s 403665800 bps
#read: 157s 68343843 bps
-Ben
Ivan Voras wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:_______________________________________________
Per my discussion with Scott Long Can you repeat the test for UFS, but create gstripe with a really small stripe size, like 4 KB?
Actually, no need to do that - it looks like iozone is doing quite random IO ops so it won't help you.
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- ZFS, Dell PE2950
- From: Benjeman J. Meekhof
- Re: ZFS, Dell PE2950
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: ZFS, Dell PE2950
- From: Benjeman Meekhof
- Re: ZFS, Dell PE2950
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: ZFS, Dell PE2950
- From: Ivan Voras
- ZFS, Dell PE2950
- Prev by Date: Re: ZFS, Dell PE2950
- Next by Date: NFS performance
- Previous by thread: Re: ZFS, Dell PE2950
- Next by thread: Tweaking Disk Cache/Buffers and fsync
- Index(es):