Re: TTY task group scheduling
- From: David Magda <dmagda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:50:58 -0500
On Nov 18, 2010, at 18:43, Julian Elischer wrote:
we are part of the way there..
at least we did abstract the scheduler to the point where we have two completely different ones. you are welcome to develop a 'framework as you describe and plug it into the abstraction we already have.
It may be something to suggest for the next round of Google's Summer of Code. Or perhaps part of a school project in operating systems work (master's level? eager-beaver bachelor's thesis?).
Having a bit more flexibility in being able to make different components "pluggable" would help encourage the use of BSD in more research projects. And more people learning and hacking on BSD can't be a bad thing. :)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- TTY task group scheduling
- From: grarpamp
- Re: TTY task group scheduling
- From: O. Hartmann
- Re: TTY task group scheduling
- From: Andriy Gapon
- Re: TTY task group scheduling
- From: Matthew D. Fuller
- Re: TTY task group scheduling
- From: Alexander Best
- Re: TTY task group scheduling
- From: Alexander Kabaev
- Re: TTY task group scheduling
- From: Daniel Nebdal
- Re: TTY task group scheduling
- From: Alexander Best
- Re: TTY task group scheduling
- From: Julian Elischer
- TTY task group scheduling
- Prev by Date: Re: TTY task group scheduling
- Next by Date: Re: TTY task group scheduling
- Previous by thread: Re: TTY task group scheduling
- Next by thread: Re: TTY task group scheduling
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
