Re: television cable internet service

From: chris corayer (ccorayer_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/17/03

  • Next message: Gary Jennejohn: "Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available"
    To: <questions@freebsd.org>
    Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 16:06:29 -0400
    
    

    >To make life easy, I had a windows box laying around for the technician
    >to verify a live line with. Once it was live and he was gone, I
    >switched to using a BSD router on the connection.

    I did the same here. Although to be honest, nothing the tech did here
    should have made any difference whatsoever. He plugged in the modem, booted
    the computer ( DHCP ), and went into the browser for a couple of minutes.

    >Yeah, they are paranoid about servers, but never do anything about them
    >until it starts to cost them money. If they were really strict on the
    >no servers policy, they would be able to allow any windows box to
    >connect to their network.

    The tech didn't mention anything about servers to me. But in all honesty I
    haven't bothered to try and see if they're blocking ports or not. I would
    suspect that they are though.

    >BSD should work fine with Comcast. I am not sure how comcast in your
    >area differs from the seattle area, but they should all be BSD friendly.
    >The big trouble is that initial service with cable/dsl is rather flaky.
    >It usually takes the ISP a month or so to figure out how a network is to
    >be expanded or something.

    My BSD stuff works fine here. And yes, for the first couple of months the
    service would flake out daily in the early afternoon. Lately it's been
    solid. Depending on what your needs are, you could also consider a cheap
    router ( linksys or others ) as they're down to ~50$ or so. That's not much
    more than a cheap switch at this point, so even if you don't decide to use
    it as a router you can use it for your network anyway. Much of it is point
    and click, which may be useful until you learn more about how to fully set
    up your BSD box's firewalling and such. As the DHCP server and NAT are
    already built in, this might also be helpful until you get DHCP server set
    up on your BSD box as well.

    Hope this helps.

    -Chris
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Gary Jennejohn: "Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: 8.04 networking seems awfully broken.
      ... alternative OS on a laptop belonging to somebody who normally ... uses Windows, but would be willing to give Linux a try. ... up and f*&king up the network configuration. ... _is_ a response from a DHCP server. ...
      (Ubuntu)
    • Re: DHCP
      ... recall seeing a PC look for a DHCP server before Windows starts. ... drivers and protocols are Windows based and it should be doing that after XP ... >I assume your network connection uses a DHCP server to ... Does the internet connection have to have the ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter)
    • Re: win2003 server and dhcp
      ... >unauthorized DHCP server already on the network. ... It sounds like you have a router or Windows Server which is relaying ... If you can persuade the people controlling the remote DHCP server to ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
    • Qtek 9000 / Mobile 5 network problem
      ... This message concerns the fact that I can connect to my wireless network ... tcpdump output on linux DHCP server (MAC address ... WAP directly to a Windows PC, using Windows internet connection sharing on ...
      (microsoft.public.pocketpc.wireless)
    • Re: lost nic
      ... >>setup Debian to think it's running static. ... redhat & fbsd over three different windows boxes ... think it's the dhcp server for the network. ...
      (Debian-User)