Re: chkrootkit version 0.41 results on FBSD 5.1R#0

From: Kris Kennaway (kris_at_obsecurity.org)
Date: 06/26/03

  • Next message: Q?=shura shevQ=20?=: "Help me"
    Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 04:16:11 -0700
    To: Tak Pui LOU <lou@man-97-187.ResHall.Berkeley.EDU>
    
    
    

    On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 02:14:45AM -0700, Tak Pui LOU wrote:
    > I read about this before. But, I just updated the port source tree and did
    > a portupgrade. These programs are still listed as INFECTED. So, my
    > question should be if these have been fixed or someone is really messing
    > with my system.

    This question is asked regularly on the FreeBSD mailing lists. Please
    do some further research.

    Kris

    
    



  • Next message: Q?=shura shevQ=20?=: "Help me"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: chkrootkit version 0.41 results on FBSD 5.1R#0
      ... I just updated the port source tree and did ... a portupgrade. ... On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: ... To unsubscribe, ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: INDEX broken?
      ... On 2005-01-05, Huub wrote: ... > Kris Kennaway wrote: ... notes regarding portupgrade - you may have to update ruby as well. ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
    • Re: portupgrade: uninstall error ???
      ... > I am seeing many uninstall errors lately when I do a portupgrade ... > (particularily with Gnome). ... Can you give us a hint? ... Kris ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • gtar now in base system
      ... While exec 'portupgrade gtar-1.13.25_5' ... "...gtar is in base system." ... Kris ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: /usr/ports/lang/ruby
      ... Kris Kennaway writes: ... The port has not been upgraded, ... The next time it is upgraded, portupgrade will follow the ...
      (freebsd-questions)