Re: (g)cc and /usr/local
From: Kent Hauser (kent.hauser_at_verizon.net)
Date: 07/09/03
- Previous message: Chuck Swiger: "Re: dd an audio cd on 5.x ?"
- In reply to: Dan Nelson: "Re: (g)cc and /usr/local"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 12:49:16 -1000
Not the case -- at least on SunOS 3.x & 4.x (the CSRG based versions).
On those machines, /bin/cc looked in /usr/local/{include,lib} first -- just
like gcc did.
Solaris (aka SunOS 5+) is a SVR5 system which had an optional compiler.
I don't recall what happened when the vendor compiler was installed -- I
always used gcc.
On Tuesday 08 July 2003 12:42 pm, you wrote:
> In the last episode (Jul 08), Kent Hauser said:
> > Why doesn't gcc look in /usr/local/{include,lib} on FreeBSD? It
> > always did on my sun box. Installing in "/usr/local" is standard on
> > CSRG systems -- why is looking non-standard on FreeBSD?
>
> Because when you installed gcc on Solaris, it probably installed into
> /usr/local/bin, which means it'll search /usr/local/include for
> headers. gcc on FreeBSD is the default compiler, is installed in
> /usr/bin, and does not search /usr/local/include. I bet if you were to
> run Solaris' default cc, it wouldn't search /usr/local/include either.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Chuck Swiger: "Re: dd an audio cd on 5.x ?"
- In reply to: Dan Nelson: "Re: (g)cc and /usr/local"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
