Re: FBSD PowerPak
From: Kris Kennaway (kris_at_obsecurity.org)
Date: 07/17/03
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: No /proc or procfs by default in 5.1-RELEASE ... why ?"
- In reply to: Robert Storey: "FBSD PowerPak"
- Next in thread: Jud: "Re: FBSD PowerPak"
- Reply: Jud: "Re: FBSD PowerPak"
- Reply: W. J. Williams: "Re: FBSD PowerPak"
- Reply: W. J. Williams: "ISO images of ports collection"
- Reply: Murray Stokely: "Re: FBSD PowerPak"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 05:41:01 -0700 To: Robert Storey <y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net>
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:37:48PM +0800, Robert Storey wrote:
> I recently ordered and received the 4-CD set of FBSD 5.1.
>
> I had presumed that this would give me a pretty complete desktop setup.
> Alas, I was wrong. A lot of very commmon apps are missing, such as
> Xemacs and Mplayer. It's disappointing. I only have a dialup modem. I
> don't have broadband and have no hope of getting it where I live, so I
> was counting on the 4-CD set to fill in the gaps.
xemacs21 is scheduled for disc1 if possible, but I suppose it was
bumped because of lack of space. There are some xemacs and mplayer
support packages on disc 3 and 4, but xemacs and mplayer themselves
are missing. It looks like the CD layout could do with some tweaking.
> I noticed on the FreeBSDmall web site that they sell a PowerPak with 10
> CDs. This is supposed to be the entire ports collection. Sounds like
> just what I need - except it's based on FBSD 4.6 which is one year old.
>
> So my question - I am wondering if the distfiles in this PowerPak are
> going to be of much use? Shelling out $40 isn't such a great hardship if
> the disfiles work as advertised, but I'm going to be more than a little
> pissed if it generates nothing but error messages. Does anybody know if
> the PowerPak will work with 5.1? Has anyone actually tried it?
As you noted, it's based on 4.6, so the contents are a year old. If
you don't mind getting year-old versions of ports, then go for it.
Kris
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: No /proc or procfs by default in 5.1-RELEASE ... why ?"
- In reply to: Robert Storey: "FBSD PowerPak"
- Next in thread: Jud: "Re: FBSD PowerPak"
- Reply: Jud: "Re: FBSD PowerPak"
- Reply: W. J. Williams: "Re: FBSD PowerPak"
- Reply: W. J. Williams: "ISO images of ports collection"
- Reply: Murray Stokely: "Re: FBSD PowerPak"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|