Mirroring Vinum Volumes - importance of subdisk sequence on mirror device
From: Richard Johannesson (rtjohan_at_syspres.com)
Date: 07/30/03
- Previous message: Kenneth Culver: "Re: nforce2 audio?"
- Next in thread: Richard Johannesson: "RE: Mirroring Vinum Volumes - importance of subdisk sequence on mirrordevice"
- Reply: Richard Johannesson: "RE: Mirroring Vinum Volumes - importance of subdisk sequence on mirrordevice"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:52:17 -0700
Question:
Is it important that the sequence plexes/sub-disks get created in for the
primary drive and the mirrored drive be the same? Any performance penalty?
I'm guessing that a different sub-disk creation order will put the sub-disks
in different places on a disk.
Background - if needed:
Have 10 vinum volumes being mapped by 10 plexes to the root drive.
To get mirroring, I created plexes/sub-disks for swap, root, and usr using
the specific offsets for each on the 2nd hdd device and map them back to
their specific volumes they should be mirroring.
When I start creating the other plexes/sub-disks on the 2nd hdd and map them
back to the volume already setup, I won't be using specific offsets.
Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Kenneth Culver: "Re: nforce2 audio?"
- Next in thread: Richard Johannesson: "RE: Mirroring Vinum Volumes - importance of subdisk sequence on mirrordevice"
- Reply: Richard Johannesson: "RE: Mirroring Vinum Volumes - importance of subdisk sequence on mirrordevice"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]