Re: 20TB Storage System
From: Petri Helenius (pete_at_he.iki.fi)
Date: 09/03/03
- Previous message: Grzegorz Czaplinski: "Re: Daemonnews?"
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: 20TB Storage System"
- Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: 20TB Storage System"
- Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: 20TB Storage System"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 23:24:22 +0300 To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>I am not sure I would advocate 64k blocks yet.
>
>
Good to know, I have stuck with 16k so far due to the fact that our
database has pagesize of 16k and I found little benefit tuning that.
(but itīs completely different application)
>I tend to stick with 32k block, 4k fragment myself.
>
>This is a problem which is in the cross-hairs for 6.x
>
>
You have any insight into the fsck memory consumption? I remember getting
myself saved quite a long time ago by reducing the number of inodes.
Pete
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Grzegorz Czaplinski: "Re: Daemonnews?"
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: 20TB Storage System"
- Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: 20TB Storage System"
- Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: 20TB Storage System"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
