Re: Changing a company from 100% Windows to 100% FreeBSD.

From: Lee Mx (lee_ver_mx_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 11/17/03

  • Next message: Alex de Kruijff: "Re: OT sendmail mailing lists wanted .."
    To: freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl
    Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:47:53 -0800
    
    

    >From: Alex de Kruijff <freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl>
    >To: Lee Mx <lee_ver_mx@hotmail.com>
    >CC: questions@freebsd.org
    >Subject: Re: Changing a company from 100% Windows to 100% FreeBSD.
    >Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:32:23 +0100
    >
    >On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:27:25AM -0800, Lee Mx wrote:
    > > I am switching about 40 desktop's running different versions of
    > > windows over to freebsd. One of the primary requirements is
    > > OpenOffice-1.1 and I've always run it locally on my laptop.
    > > I'm considering running it over the LAN which would mean that
    > > I suppose that I would NFS mount the binary and do the network
    > > install. Could someone who has done this tell me if they
    > > recommend running it on the network or if it would be better to
    > > just install it on each of the 40 machines. This company and
    > > every user, uses Office daily, especially excel.
    >
    >Running it over the network should be posible. It does come at a
    >high performance cost. The local hard disk has a much higher respond
    >rate. Personaly, i would go for the independed workstation.

    Yes, Alex, I think you are probably right. Although the LAN is
    always a temptation :-).

    >
    > >
    > > Also if anyone has any other suggestions that would simplify
    > > anything in the chain from the initial installation to periodic
    > > upgrading, it would be highly appreciated.
    >
    >I'm not sure if you looking for this, but you may wanna read this:
    >http://www.infrastructures.org/ - Its all about how to effienctly manage

    Looks interesting. It's not exactly what I had in mind but worth
    a read for sure.

    >you enterprise cluster. Its quite a bit of work to setup at first and
    >saves you lots of work later.

    Sounds like most everything that we do ;-)
    >
    > > I'm planning on having a central server that will be cvsuping
    > > updated sources and ports daily, making world and portupgrade
    > > -Rruap periodically. I plan to NFS mount /usr/ports and not
    > > have local copies to not have to update them. I'm thinking that
    > > I could then, fairly easily upgrade the other machines by just
    > > installing the packages when needed. It could also serve as a
    > > local repository for updating the operating system or I suppose
    > > that I could also NFS mount /usr/src and /usr/obj and do an
    > > installworld to upgrade, too. Again any opinions, observations
    > > or suggestion are highly appreciated. I've never changed
    > > 100% to FreeBSD before :-)
    >
    >This would mean that you have to manage every workstation manualy. If
    >there all alike you could just configure one and let the other
    >synchonise themselfs. You may wanna have a look at the port rsync.

    I've thought about that but I thinking of automating the portupgrade
    process rather than having to find all the --exclude's for rsync but
    that could surely change.

    Thanks for your suggestions and the link.

    ed
    >
    >--
    >Alex
    >
    >Articles based on solutions that I use:
    >http://www.kruijff.org/alex/index.php?dir=docs/FreeBSD/
    >_______________________________________________
    >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
    >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
    >To unsubscribe, send any mail to
    >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

    _________________________________________________________________
    MSN Shopping upgraded for the holidays! Snappier product search...
    http://shopping.msn.com

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Alex de Kruijff: "Re: OT sendmail mailing lists wanted .."

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Verry disapointing
      ... > About 2 weeks ago I used apt-get to update and upgrade, ... > my lan and sound. ... > unstable and downloaded a disk to install testing. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Kaseya
      ... network and referencing the results to it's database of PCs that it's ... The Kaseya server feedback's not mandatory but once it's given, ... that has rights to install software on the machine. ... a "probe" equipment at the remote LAN. ...
      (Pen-Test)
    • Re: Error: Cannot find a valid Windows XP Embedded database installed
      ... This is true - if your computer does not have a network connection, ... And you are connected to a network when performing the upgrade to SP2? ... I'm trying to install Windows XP Embedded but I'm getting an error. ... database, I'll install the tools in another computer. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.embedded)
    • Re: Office upgrade 2003 from 2000 - conflicts opening applications
      ... "Peter Foldes" wrote: ... Off 2003 is a full retail version then it will install without needing Off 2000 as ... It was an upgrade version from 2000 to 2003. ... home - outside the work network. ...
      (microsoft.public.officeupdate)
    • Re: Office upgrade 2003 from 2000 - conflicts opening applications
      ... If Off 2003 is a full retail version then it will install without needing Off 2000 as proof. ... If Off 2003 is an Upgrade version then start the install and when it asks for a proof of previous version then stick the Off 2000 disc in as the proof. ... "Alex" wrote in message ... >>> to the fact that the network is Office 2000 based. ...
      (microsoft.public.officeupdate)

    Loading