Re: 5.x downgrade recommendation
From: Kris Kennaway (kris_at_obsecurity.org)
Date: 11/27/03
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: poor NFS performance in 5.x"
- In reply to: Guy Van Sanden: "5.x downgrade recommendation"
- Next in thread: JacobRhoden: "Re: 5.x downgrade recommendation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 01:30:31 -0800 To: Guy Van Sanden <guy.van.sanden@pandora.be>
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 10:18:00AM +0100, Guy Van Sanden wrote:
> I've moved to the 5.x branch since 5.0-RLEASE, currently, I'm running
> 5.1-RELEASE.
>
> I'm now considering if I will do the upgrade to 5.2-RELEASE, or
> reinstall the system with 4.9 or 4.10.
> The 5.x branch seems to remain rather unstable longer then I had
> anticipated.
>
> What would you guys recommend, wait out for 5.3 (which is supposed to be
> 4.x-like stable), or move back to 4.9 (or 4.10 soon).
>
> Will 5.2 be much better?
Hopefully, but it's not yet designated as -STABLE because it needs to
become better-proven. Stick with the 4.x branch if you don't want to
deal with this kind of problem.
Kris
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: poor NFS performance in 5.x"
- In reply to: Guy Van Sanden: "5.x downgrade recommendation"
- Next in thread: JacobRhoden: "Re: 5.x downgrade recommendation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]