Re: /proc directory
From: Kris Kennaway (kris_at_obsecurity.org)
Date: 12/17/03
- Previous message: michael Alexander: "RE: Load new drivers during install"
- In reply to: Matthew Seaman: "Re: /proc directory"
- Next in thread: Matthew Seaman: "Re: /proc directory"
- Reply: Matthew Seaman: "Re: /proc directory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 06:09:32 -0800 To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>, flux <flux@hotbox.ru>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 12:12:18PM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Basically you mount it on your system, which lets a bunch of stuff
> work properly, and you then ignore it for ever more. Unless you're
> particularly concerned about security, in which case, you don't mount
> it and do without the stuff that needs it to run. Note that mounting
> the /proc directory is only a risk in the eyes of the most utterly
> paranoid administrators.
You're downplaying the security implications quite remarkably there:
procfs has been the source of numerous local root vulnerabilities over
the years, which should be a concern to anyone with untrusted local
users.
Kris
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: michael Alexander: "RE: Load new drivers during install"
- In reply to: Matthew Seaman: "Re: /proc directory"
- Next in thread: Matthew Seaman: "Re: /proc directory"
- Reply: Matthew Seaman: "Re: /proc directory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|