RE: ipf / pf availability in 4.9
From: fbsd_user (fbsd_user_at_a1poweruser.com)
Date: 12/31/03
- Previous message: Mark Zytkovicz: "I don't understand make world"
- In reply to: Will Prater: "Re: ipf / pf availability in 4.9"
- Next in thread: Will Prater: "Re: ipf / pf availability in 4.9"
- Reply: Will Prater: "Re: ipf / pf availability in 4.9"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "Will Prater" <lists-wp@mercurycloud.net>, <questions@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 08:12:57 -0500
The post you are replying to tells you pf has been ported to FBSD.
All you had to do is go look for it in the port collection your
self,
here is the direct link.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=pf&stype=all&release=5.1-
CURRENT%2Fi386
pf_freebsd-2.00_1
OpenBSD pf as a kldmodule
Maintained by: max@love2party.net
Also listed in: ipv6
Description : Sources : Package : Changes : Download
http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/index.html
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Will Prater
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 2:59 AM
To: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ipf / pf availability in 4.9
List,
Anyone know if there is a way to get PF to port to FreeBSD 4.9?
Thanks
On Dec 30, 2003, at 7:26 PM, fbsd_user wrote:
> PF has been just ported to FBSD. I don't know if ipf & pf have a
> common code background, but I do know pf & ipf have totally
> different rule processing logic though the rules do look some what
> common. When it comes to using variables on the rule set, that is
> just the normal function of shell processing. Ipfw, ipf, and pf
can
> all be buried inside of an shell script and perform variable
> substitution.
> In FBSD the rc.conf statement for pointing to the directory
location
> of the ipf rules can not process a script. You just point that
> rc.conf statement to an empty file just to get the system up. Then
> you have script in the startup application directory that executes
> to load the ipf rules. Works great.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of
> j.l@telus.net
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 7:35 PM
> To: questions@FreeBSD.org
> Subject: ipf / pf
>
> Hi,
>
> Here's a question that might seem trivial:
>
> What's the relationship between the freebsd ipf and the openbsd
pf?
> Are they
> the same thing, or are they separately developed branches of a
> common
> codebase? Or maybe they are totally different. I ask this
because
> I was
> looking around for guides for ipf.rules, and some of the openbsd
pf
> examples
> look similar, but some command syntax are different. The openbsd
> pf.conf
> example had the ability to define variables of ip addresses,
> interface names,
> etc, but it doesn't seem to work with ipf.rules. Is there any way
> to define
> variables in ipf.rules?
>
> please cc me in your responses cause I'm not subscribed to the
list
>
> thanks so much
> jonathan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
>
--will
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Mark Zytkovicz: "I don't understand make world"
- In reply to: Will Prater: "Re: ipf / pf availability in 4.9"
- Next in thread: Will Prater: "Re: ipf / pf availability in 4.9"
- Reply: Will Prater: "Re: ipf / pf availability in 4.9"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
- Re: ipf / pf availability in 4.9
... and my question was how to get a port to 4.9. ... >> of the ipf rules
can not process a script. ... >> What's the relationship between the freebsd ipf and the
openbsd ... >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to ... (freebsd-questions) - Re: ipf / pf
... that ipf used to be in openbsd, until some sort of license dispute. ... Then
the openbsd people supposedly wrote their own pf ... ... >of the ipf rules can not process
a script. ... To unsubscribe, ... (freebsd-questions) - Re: Converting from IPFW to IPFILTER
... Chuck Swiger wrote: ... IPF was NOT added to 5.x, PF (from OpenBSD
was). ... To unsubscribe, ... (freebsd-questions) - RE: video guru needed - installing driver for ATI 3D Rage IIC AGP
... I use it on OpenBSD and didn't imagine that it wouldn't exist on ... look at
the OpenBSD port ... ... To unsubscribe, ... (freebsd-questions) - Re: natd port forward times out, tcpdump yields nothing
... When someone connects to irc.domain.com on IRC ports (6667, 8067, ... port
requests to the IRC jail as per normal (such as port 80, ... $IPF 10 allow all from
any to any via lo0 ... $IPF 20 deny all from any to 127.0.0.0/8 ... (freebsd-net)