Re: Customizing a 'make release'...

From: Alex de Kruijff (freebsd_at_akruijff.dds.nl)
Date: 02/29/04

  • Next message: Matthew Seaman: "Re: Athlon"
    Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 19:19:43 +0100
    To: Peter Losher <plosher-keyword-freebsd.a36e57@plosh.net>
    
    

    On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 09:43:38PM -0800, Peter Losher wrote:
    > (If this question is better served on another list, let me know)
    >
    > I am trying to come up with a custom FreeBSD ISO w/ my personal
    > preferences (no integrated OpenSSH, Heimdal, or Sendmail) I have been
    > working off of
    > http://www.gsoft.com.au/~doconnor/FreeBSD-release-2.html, and
    >
    > /usr/bin/time sh -c 'make release CHROOTDIR=/hog0/release NODOC=YES
    > NOPORTS=YES BUILDNAME=5.2-REL-FOO CVSROOT=/hog1/FreeBSD-CVS
    > RELEASETAG=RELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE' | & tee /tmp/release.log
    >
    > Now my understanding is that 'make release' honors the variables set
    > in /etc/make.conf, where I have:
    >
    > -=-
    > NO_OPENSSH=true
    > NO_KERBEROS=true
    > NO_SENDMAIL=true
    > -=-
    >
    > After creating the binaries and the ISO image, installing the OS on a new
    > box results in a sendmail-less install, but it still has all the OpenSSH
    > and Heimdal bits included. Do I needed to declare NO_OPENSSH and
    > NO_KERBEROS on the 'make release' command line?

    It shoudn't be requered. Your guess is a good as mine as to way it still
    build openssh.

    > Also, is there any way to change the default bits the install process -
    > like the default auto-partition (I prefer to leave the /var partition
    > with the remaining space instead of /usr as it is now), and have it
    > automatically install certain packages instead of asking.
    >
    > Thanks in advance for any advice you can pass along...

    Yes there is. See man sysinstall for more information on this.

    -- 
    Alex
    Articles based on solutions that I use:
    http://www.kruijff.org/alex/index.php?dir=docs/FreeBSD/
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Matthew Seaman: "Re: Athlon"

    Relevant Pages

    • Customizing a make release...
      ... I am trying to come up with a custom FreeBSD ISO w/ my personal ... preferences (no integrated OpenSSH, Heimdal, or Sendmail) I have been ... box results in a sendmail-less install, but it still has all the OpenSSH ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: trojaned SSHD ?
      ... I'd recommend moving to OpenSSH, which supports both ssh1 and ssh2 ... platforms, including Solaris. ... Information relevant to the installation of SSH on NCMIR systems. ... * Install Zlib 1.1.2 libraries, compiling from source, on Solaris and IRIX ...
      (Focus-SUN)
    • Re: Authentication failed suddenly
      ... I had to play the gcc re-installation game to get OpenSSH 3.4p1 to ... this is absolutely no reason to tell people to stay away from ... On both the Solaris installs I did, I built with the default privsep ... actually the 'make install' did the latter for me) - ...
      (comp.security.ssh)
    • RE: OpenSSH b0rked (was RE: Problems with IPFW patch)
      ... fix was the config file. ... No reboots or restarting sshd necessary. ... > Subject: RE: OpenSSH b0rked ... >> annoying install sequence - you can't define where it gets ...
      (FreeBSD-Security)
    • Re: OpenSSL/0.9.7c-p1 & OpenSSH_3.5p1
      ... which means that all known bugs in OpenSSL and OpenSSH will have been ... If you install from ports, there is a facility for you to install the ... port in such a way as to overwrite the equivalents in the base system. ... Otherwise, if you choose to upgrade to a different source branch, you ...
      (freebsd-questions)