Re: Update utility
From: Simon Barner (barner_at_in.tum.de)
Date: 03/09/04
- Previous message: Bart Silverstrim: "Re: Amavis-Stats."
- In reply to: Chris: "Re: Update utility"
- Next in thread: Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.: "Re: Update utility"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:07:57 +0100 To: Chris <racerx@makeworld.com>
Chris wrote:
> > However, once you use a source based update method, the port will not work
> > any longer, since your installation will consist of custom binaries that do
> > not match the recorded checksums.
> I like the idea of the bin-updates. Most of the end users of FBSD really
> don't have a need to have custom src so this may be a very acceptable
> way to go.
I was not necessarily thinking of local changes to the source tree, but
also of some applications that can be compiled with customized options
(e.g. sendmail with TSL+SASL support). Of course, I agree with you,
that the majority of end users will not do this (or use one of the
ports).
Btw. I just had a look at the web site[1], and it seems that
freebsd-update can deal with systems that were updated using the source
based method.
[...]
> I'm interested in the time it takes to do the freebsd-update, and
> if rebooting is needed.
I haven't tried it, either. I guess that you will need to reboot as soon
as the kernel is patched, otherwise shutting down and restarting the
service in question should be enough.
Simon
-- [1] http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-update/
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Bart Silverstrim: "Re: Amavis-Stats."
- In reply to: Chris: "Re: Update utility"
- Next in thread: Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.: "Re: Update utility"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|