Re: Pernicious problem with vfork / qmail / qmail-scanner (RESOLVED)
From: Justin Baugh, KSC (baughj_at_discordians.net)
Date: 03/14/04
- Previous message: Kai Grossjohann: "Re: Binary upgrades?"
- In reply to: Gary: "Re: Pernicious problem with vfork / qmail / qmail-scanner (RESOLVED)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:23:14 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Happen to catch this, this morning... Good dig on this..
>
> Tcpserver *defaults* to a maximum of 40 simultaneous connections, so
> this could very well be where your problem is.. Sorry, should have
> thought of this earlier.
>
> You can raise this limit with the -c n (n=number) option..
>
> Please see
>
> <http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver.html>
Nope, I'm aware of that limit, and -c was set to 120. The problem
would arise with any number for n...no matter what, it would still get
caught up at 40 connections.
The fact that I couldn't replicate the problem with the exact same setup
under 5.2.1R makes me think it's something related to the version that
came with the machine.
Thanks,
-Justin
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Kai Grossjohann: "Re: Binary upgrades?"
- In reply to: Gary: "Re: Pernicious problem with vfork / qmail / qmail-scanner (RESOLVED)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|