Re: XFree86 4.4 in FreeBSD?

From: Jerry McAllister (jerrymc_at_clunix.cl.msu.edu)
Date: 03/31/04

  • Next message: Toni Heinonen: "RE: XFree86 4.4 in FreeBSD?"
    To: jester@panix.com (Jesse Sheidlower)
    Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:46:09 -0500 (EST)
    
    

    >
    > On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 06:03:19PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
    > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 08:59:42PM -0500, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
    > > >
    > > > I'm about to install FreeBSD on a new computer, and was
    > > > looking over the release notes for XFree86 in preparation and
    > > > discovered that the Current release is 4.4. Though I don't
    > > > think I actively need any of the features of version 4.4, I do
    > > > wonder why it hasn't made it into the Ports system yet. It's
    > > > been out for a month, and there are FreeBSD binaries on the
    > > > XFree86 site.
    > > >
    > > > There doesn't seem to have been much discussion of it here. Are
    > > > there any specific problems with 4.4, or is it just a big job
    > > > to port it and deal with dependencies?
    > >
    > > The latter.
    >
    > Hmm. This is distressing, as I've discovered since posting my
    > original message not long ago that my video card (ATI Mobility
    > FireGL T2) is not supported in 4.3, but is supported in 4.4.
    >
    > How grim a job is it going to be to handle the X setup manually,
    > and how badly will I get screwed every time I try to install a
    > new X-based app?

    Why are you concerned about 4.3 or 4.4?
    The most recent release in the 4.xxx track is 4.9. Download it
    and install (buy the CD set). The most recent release in the 5.xxx
    track for the more adventurous is 5.2.1 and 5.3 is coming "soon".

    Unless you have some really odd application that can't be updated
    to run on a more recent version, don't even consider anything older
    than 4.9 or 5.2.1 (those are effectively different tracks - 4.xxx is
    the stable track right now and 5.xxx is the development [read experimental]
    track right now. As 5.xxx finishes cleaning up, it will become the
    stable track - soon, but not yet).

    ////jerry
    >
    > Thanks.
    >
    > Jesse Sheidlower
    > _______________________________________________
    > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
    > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
    > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    >

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Toni Heinonen: "RE: XFree86 4.4 in FreeBSD?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: RS6000 43p/140 AIX 4.3 new install - get stuck!
      ... She hasn't seen that I put the console on top of everything yet. ... 5.1 is the last OS version that you CAN install on the model ... and my laptop w/ Hypertrm as a console). ... particularly video card. ...
      (comp.unix.aix)
    • Re: RS6000 43p/140 AIX 4.3 new install - get stuck!
      ... of the older ECC ram for this board, see what I can scrape together. ... to AIX v5: 5.1 is the last OS version that you CAN install on the model ... particularly video card. ...
      (comp.unix.aix)
    • Re: Trying to install Video Card
      ... to install an after-market video card into an HP Pavilion ... cream-colored PCI slots. ... If a brown AGP slot exists, ... purchase and install a PCI ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
    • Re: Installer does not detect video card (not an X issue)
      ... It is a command line tool. ... > auto install everything and detect everything. ... >> Video card is a Diamond Fire GL2 with a rather old BIOS. ...
      (comp.os.linux.questions)
    • Serious Problems
      ... FX5900XT w/ 128 MB RAM Video Card ... complete format and reinstall yesterday morning. ... as if starting the windows install, ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment)