Re: Wisdom of automating upgrades
From: Peter Risdon (peter_at_circlesquared.com)
Date: 06/08/04
- Previous message: Peter Risdon: "Re: Wisdom of automating upgrades"
- In reply to: Robert Huff: "Re: Wisdom of automating upgrades"
- Next in thread: Bill Moran: "[OT] What's "QED"? (was Re: Wisdom of automating upgrades)"
- Reply: Bill Moran: "[OT] What's "QED"? (was Re: Wisdom of automating upgrades)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 17:20:40 +0100 To: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>
Robert Huff wrote:
>Peter Risdon writes:
>
>
>
>> I suppose what I'm driving at is whether the RELENG_4 branch sees
>> many commits that are likely to be problematic.
>>
>>
>
> In general, no.
> On the other hand ... think of this as a Murphy's Law scenario:
>if you automate, it _will_ break horribly two days before some
>absolutely critical deadline.
>
>
QED
Peter.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Peter Risdon: "Re: Wisdom of automating upgrades"
- In reply to: Robert Huff: "Re: Wisdom of automating upgrades"
- Next in thread: Bill Moran: "[OT] What's "QED"? (was Re: Wisdom of automating upgrades)"
- Reply: Bill Moran: "[OT] What's "QED"? (was Re: Wisdom of automating upgrades)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|