Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD
From: David O'Brien (obrien_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 06/27/04
- Previous message: Tom Parquette: "Re: voodoo 2"
- In reply to: Remi: "AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD"
- Next in thread: Michal Pasternak: "Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD"
- Reply: Michal Pasternak: "Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD"
- Reply: Daniel O'Connor: "Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 16:00:26 -0700 To: Remi <MrL0L@charter.net>
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 02:37:54PM -0700, Remi wrote:
> Im in the market for a new laptop. Right now I'm looking at HyperSonic
> laptops.
>
> I have a choice between AMD64 3200+ and a P4 2.8GHz with HT. Which one would
> you guys recommend to run FreeBSD. Obviously the i386 would be easier to
> run, so I guess my question is what is the state of the AMD64 FreeBSD
> version?
You do know you can run FreeBSD/i386 on the Athlon64 3200+ laptop,
right? :-) A 3200+ running 32-bit FreeBSD will out-perform the P4
2.8GHz running the same OS.
-- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Tom Parquette: "Re: voodoo 2"
- In reply to: Remi: "AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD"
- Next in thread: Michal Pasternak: "Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD"
- Reply: Michal Pasternak: "Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD"
- Reply: Daniel O'Connor: "Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|