Re: Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance Woes
From: MikeM (zlists_at_mgm51.com)
Date: 09/30/04
- Previous message: gkullak_at_fi.uba.ar: "Sendmail default installed? Why it is in port collection because?"
- In reply to: TM4525_at_aol.com: "Re: Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance Woes"
- Next in thread: TM4525_at_aol.com: "Re: Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance Woes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:13:55 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On 9/29/2004 at 11:27 PM TM4525@aol.com wrote:
|I'll post some numbers after trying it. But its pretty frightening to
|think that one release has such major changes. Sounds like (yet another)
|crapshoot. ...
=============
If you had taken the time to read and understand the release notes you
might not have led yourself down this path of misunderstanding.
The developers have been very up front with the fact that the 5.x releases
up to and including 5.2.1 have all been development-oriented debugging
releases that have not been optimized for performance and that include a
lot of debugging code.
5.3 is the first release of the 5.x series for which the developers have
stated that they have removed some (most?) debugging code and have made
important performance releases.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: gkullak_at_fi.uba.ar: "Sendmail default installed? Why it is in port collection because?"
- In reply to: TM4525_at_aol.com: "Re: Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance Woes"
- Next in thread: TM4525_at_aol.com: "Re: Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance Woes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
