Re: Which FreeBSD For A Production System
From: Chuck Swiger (cswiger_at_mac.com)
Date: 09/30/04
- Previous message: Joan Picanyol: "NFS locking issues => rpc.lockd: 100024 RPC: Port mapper failure"
- In reply to: Michael G. Goodell: "Which FreeBSD For A Production System"
- Next in thread: TM4525_at_aol.com: "Re: Which FreeBSD For A Production System"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:03:19 -0400 To: michael2043@comcast.net
Michael G. Goodell wrote:
> Which release of FreeBSD is best for a production environment? I am aware of
> the different branches of development: CURRENT, STABLE, RELEASE and I
> *think* I understand the meaning of each from what I have read. Perhaps not
> since I am writing this question! But, what I would like to know is when I
> am setting up a production system, or desktop for that matter, which is
> considered *THE* most stable of the choices in versions. Is it in the 4.x
> branch, 5x etc...
The most stable version of FreeBSD available today is 4.10. If your priority
is to get something that will work, stay up, and not have to fiddled with, go
with that.
If you've got some time available, beta-testing 5.3 would be very helpful. In
a matter of a few weeks, 5.3 is going to become -STABLE. It would be easier
to stay up-to-date in the future if you go with 5.3.
-- -Chuck _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Joan Picanyol: "NFS locking issues => rpc.lockd: 100024 RPC: Port mapper failure"
- In reply to: Michael G. Goodell: "Which FreeBSD For A Production System"
- Next in thread: TM4525_at_aol.com: "Re: Which FreeBSD For A Production System"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
- Re: FreeBSDs problems as seen by the BSDForen.de community
... You cannot force a _volunteer_ to work on anything ... FreeBSD is mostly
a project of volunteers, ... tree, ... They waste it on whatever they want, no matter
... (freebsd-current) - Re: Recommendations for a serial port card you can actually BUY?
... doesn't matter much. ... in that previous life when I bought my hardware
(for FreeBSD ... ready to spend 500 dollars - these cost perhaps 10 a piece. ...
(freebsd-stable) - Re: Abysmal mly Extreme RAID performance in 5.0-p7?
... What were the exact dd options you used for this? ... specify a block
size, the default block size of 512 bytes is used, and ... with block sizes above that won't matter
much. ... FreeBSD: The fastest and most stable server OS on the planet ... (freebsd-hackers) - Re: FreeBSD Ports vs. Gentoo Portage (a matter of concept)
... In ports there is no such difference, which means the lastest software is just available
using the usual port management features, without the need to fiddle around with unmasking something,
to be able to install it. ... That means, to be able to compare Gentoo Linux with FreeBSD,
you would have to run a pure unstable Gentoo system, which is generally not recommended, and especially
not for a production system. ... The answer to the question why it is considered as suitable for
production environment depends on the kind of this environment. ... (freebsd-questions) - Re: fetch extension - use local filename from content-dispositionheader (new diff)
... wget or curl instead? ... For that matter, why stick with FreeBSD
when you get ... (freebsd-current)