RE: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run?

From: Ted Mittelstaedt (tedm_at_toybox.placo.com)
Date: 10/09/04

  • Next message: NetAdmin: "RE: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run?"
    To: <TM4525@aol.com>, <krinklyfig@spymac.com>
    Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 21:56:21 -0700
    
    

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
    > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of TM4525@aol.com
    > Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 7:40 PM
    > To: krinklyfig@spymac.com
    > Cc: questions@freebsd.org
    > Subject: Re: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run?
    >
    >
    > In a message dated 10/8/04 2:25:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
    > krinklyfig@spymac.com writes:
    > > You guys are the ones making the claims that 5.3 is "going to be
    > > so great". I just wonder how you come to that conclusion if you
    > > don't have any definitive tests. I dont have a release to test, so
    > > when its done I'll test it.
    >
    > Why don't you download and install the latest 5.3 beta and test it? This
    > is the only way to test 5.3, as there is no "release" yet. If you
    > refuse to test it due to its beta status, then you should probably
    > reconsider your challenges until 5.3 is stable and you can test it for
    > yourself. If this is the case, then all you're doing now is making
    > noise ... and, yes, trolling.
    > -------------------------
    >
    > I haven't made any "challanges".

    Yes you have. Your words:

    "I just hope that pounding packets through a socket and
    timing mySQL selects aren't the entirety of your team's arsenal."

    In other words you are in effect saying "your team's" when you are
    talking about the core group that is developing FreeBSD 5 - well
    aren't you using FreeBSD yourself? If so, you are a member of that
    team. Yet, your words say the FreeBSD team is not where you are
    at?

    if you considered yourself part of the FreeBSD userbase you would say
    something like:

    "I just hope that pounding packets through a socket and
    timing mySQL selects aren't the entirety of OUR team's arsenal."

    And it's not just this sentence although this is one of the most
    blatent. You are using verbage and terminology that clearly sets
    you in opposition to the rest of us, users and developers, of FreeBSD.

    If this isn't a challenge you don't know the meaning of the word.

    > My point was that there are a lot
    > of people making claims they have no ability to substantiate. And
    > obviously I am correct.
    >

    You yourself are coming from the assumption that all these people are
    wrong or misguided. Meaning that your assumption is that FreeBSD 5
    is worse than 4. Yet you have not appeared to post anything even
    benchmarks that substantiates your claims that FreeBSD 5 is indeed
    slower.

    So put yourself into the same category as the folks that are claiming
    FreeBSD 5 is better.
     
    > A guess a "troll" is anyone who questiong the powers that be. Must be
    > a bunch of communists running the show here.

    The 'powers that be' in FreeBSD are the people contributing to it.
    If you want to have credibility which confers authority and
    therefore a small measure of what you would call "power" I guess
    then contribute something.

    To me the FreeBSD community isn't at all about power. If you want to
    see real, raw power then go work for a corporation and start making
    some decisions to spend lots of money, start hiring and firing people,
    start creating and destroying products. That's what power is all
    about - the ability to affect people's lives, directly, and in
    particular to make them do what they normally would not do.

    But, in the FreeBSD community power doesen't work like that at all.
    Even if you have a lot of money - none of these FreeBSD developers
    out here is going to take your money and work on something in
    FreeBSD that they dislike. That's not what they are here for.

    Instead, about the only measure of power that anyone has in the
    FreeBSD community is by their choice of whether to contribute or
    not.

    You choose to stand outside and throw rocks - well, your exercising
    a small amount of power yourself - because your NOT contributing anything
    of value. That lack of contribution means FreeBSD has a little bit
    less to it, which makes it a little bit less appealing.

    By contrast if you chose to create something for FreeBSD then your
    also exercising a little bit of power - because your contributing
    something of value, your making FreeBSD a bit more appealing which
    will help to attact more people to use it.

    Everyone in the FreeBSD community has this same bit of power. But
    what your missing is that the rock-throwers efforts rarely amount to
    much. Their best rock throwing is like branches scratching on the
    side of the house in the wind. By contrast the people that contribute
    to FreeBSD, well the more they contribute the more lives they affect
    and if your measuring power by the number of lives you affect, if
    you contribute a lot that will be a great many people indeed.

    So, sorry, but FreeBSD really doesen't have these "powers-that-be"
    which you seem to think it has.

    And as for a troll, that term is already well defined in many electronic
    forums.

    Ted
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: NetAdmin: "RE: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: One computer, two screens, keyboards and mouses?
      ... or power, two boxes are more powerful than one. ... I would use the FreeBSD box to remotelly connect to the ... Just switch on the one computer you want to use, ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
    • Re: Status of 6.0 for production systems
      ... >what happens on FreeBSD. ... >through my mind is the support future world energy needs. ... >things that aren't ideally power efficient. ... >A lot of people wondered how Steve Jobs could dare change over to Intel chips. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 33, Issue 6
      ... The hardware unmodified, and ran WinCE with no active cooling at all. ... completely power down - but instead enter a sleep state when the power button ... The fact is, FreeBSD, for some reason, causes hardware to run hotter. ... > is that I can fairly easily get the laptop to power off due to ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: AlphaServer 1200 powering off by itself.
      ... Since FreeBSD wasn't really written for the hardware but rather ported, ... since the fault probably occurs and kills power ... sable cpus, and 2Gb of RAM, but with Debian Sarge, not FreeBSD. ...
      (comp.unix.tru64)
    • Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ?
      ... well the people doing it are also busy and working at things ... then consider contributing money - to support someone ... Nikolas, there are many things that FreeBSD need, a large number of them do ... "It's better to light one candle than to curse the ...
      (freebsd-questions)