RE: GPL vs BSD Licence
From: Ted Mittelstaedt (tedm_at_toybox.placo.com)
Date: 10/26/04
- Previous message: Gert Cuykens: "Re: perl vs php round 1"
- In reply to: Dennis Koegel: "Re: GPL vs BSD Licence"
- Next in thread: Dennis Koegel: "Re: GPL vs BSD Licence"
- Reply: Dennis Koegel: "Re: GPL vs BSD Licence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "Dennis Koegel" <amf@hobbit.neveragain.de>, "Philipp Huber" <uebs@gmx.at> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 23:32:04 -0700
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Dennis Koegel
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 1:21 AM
> To: Philipp Huber
>
> Because Juniper, for example, are perfectly free to decide against
> making their changes to the (in this case) FreeBSD code available
> anyone at all.
You do realize, don't you, that the interesting part of a Juniper
is the microcode in their DSP routing engine. FreeBSD is only used
to control the routing engine in a Juniper router, it isn't used AS
the routing engine.
I really doubt that anything Juniper has done to FreeBSD would be
of much interest to anyone other than Cisco Systems, and Cisco would
only be interested in it as a way of finding out weaknesses in Juniper
routers that they could market against.
Actually a more interesting example is some of the Linksys routers
do indeed use an embedded Linux along with Zebra as the routing engine.
Ted
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Gert Cuykens: "Re: perl vs php round 1"
- In reply to: Dennis Koegel: "Re: GPL vs BSD Licence"
- Next in thread: Dennis Koegel: "Re: GPL vs BSD Licence"
- Reply: Dennis Koegel: "Re: GPL vs BSD Licence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|