Re: question on portupgrade and FreeBSD branches

From: Erik Trulsson (ertr1013_at_student.uu.se)
Date: 12/06/04

  • Next message: Donald J. O'Neill: "Re: Shutdown my pc"
    Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 20:25:06 +0100
    To: rain cip <raincip@yahoo.com>
    
    

    On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 11:09:04AM -0800, rain cip wrote:
    > Hello,
    >
    > I am new to the FreeBSD ports collection system and am having some
    > difficulty understanding how the ports collection works with the
    > FreeBSD branches. After having perused the ports collection doc on
    > the FreeBSD website, I got the impression that it is the FreeBSD
    > branch tag that determines which versions of the packages or ports
    > will be installed/upgraded. But this is somehow confusing to me when
    > I need to upgrade a port. Here is an example. I have FreeBSD 5.3
    > installed via CD so it appears to me that the "branch tag" used by my
    > installation is 5.3-RELEASE. I installed a bunch of packages from
    > the CD, then updated the ports collection using the CVSup. Now, if I
    > use portupgrade to upgrade a package, on which branch will it look
    > for the new ports?
    >
    > One example is KDE. I had version 3.3.0 installed via the ports
    > collection but now there is a new 3.3.1 version out there, which
    > appears to be on the 5.3 STABLE branch. But can I simply use the
    > portupgrade on my 5.3-RELEASE to upgrade KDE to the 3.3.1 port?

    The ports tree is not branched, so the same ports are used for all
    FreeBSD versions.

    Packages are slightly different, since the resulting binaries will
    be different when compiled on FreeBSD 5.x vs 4.x (new compiler, updated
    libraries, etc.)
    I don't use packages myself, and I don't use portupgrade at all, so I
    don't know exactly what it will do in your case, but I suspect it will
    do the "right thing" and work fine.

    -- 
    <Insert your favourite quote here.>
    Erik Trulsson
    ertr1013@student.uu.se
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Donald J. O'Neill: "Re: Shutdown my pc"

    Relevant Pages

    • FreeBSD Status Report Second Quarter 2006
      ... April-June 2006 Status Report ... With the release of FreeBSD 5.5 and FreeBSD 6.1, ... consider the "Open Tasks lists" provided with some reports. ... Improving Ports Collection ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • FreeBSD Status Report Second Quarter 2006
      ... April-June 2006 Status Report ... With the release of FreeBSD 5.5 and FreeBSD 6.1, ... consider the "Open Tasks lists" provided with some reports. ... Improving Ports Collection ...
      (freebsd-hackers)
    • Re: Getting started with FreeBSD
      ... My opinion of FreeBSD is do not try to configure X-11 desktops and apps with it. ... the relationship between ports, packages and security. ... You can install the same metapackage in any Unix OS, if you love the bloat--uh, I mean functionality--or use another DE/WM to navigate around your desktop. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report, First Quarter of 2007
      ... This report covers FreeBSD related projects between January and March ... Building Linux Device Drivers on FreeBSD ... Ports Collection ... Initially the project focused on USB webcams, ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report, First Quarter of 2007
      ... This report covers FreeBSD related projects between January and March ... Building Linux Device Drivers on FreeBSD ... Ports Collection ... Initially the project focused on USB webcams, ...
      (freebsd-hackers)