Re: upgrading perl
From: Skylar Thompson (skylar_at_cs.earlham.edu)
Date: 12/31/04
- Previous message: Paul Schmehl: "Re: upgrading perl"
- In reply to: Erik Norgaard: "Re: upgrading perl"
- Next in thread: Paul Schmehl: "Re: upgrading perl"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 12:48:35 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 12:46:09PM +0100, Erik Norgaard wrote:
> I haven't found big differences between 5.6 and 5.8, so I'd suggest you
> use 5.8. The main reason to stick with an older version is that you
> might develop scripts for platforms where the newer are not available.
I've noticed some memory allocation bugs with 5.6, so I'd just go straight
for 5.8.
-- -- Skylar Thompson (skylar@cs.earlham.edu) -- http://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Paul Schmehl: "Re: upgrading perl"
- In reply to: Erik Norgaard: "Re: upgrading perl"
- Next in thread: Paul Schmehl: "Re: upgrading perl"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
- Re: Future of MFC?
... reason to not use .Net. ... for native code development, and with tools
that were as good as those ... If those things matter to you you won't be interested in MFC,
... pretty-much a rarity on non-Windows platforms (and can't be guaranteed ... (microsoft.public.vc.mfc) - Re: automake, autoconf compiling
... scripts are indeed very platform independent. ... > reason why the
FreeBSD ports infrastructure needs to play so many ... the reason the Ports go through
all the hoops you see is that they ... One other reason is, of course, the fact that the autotools
have changed ... (freebsd-newbies) - Re: automake, autoconf compiling
... scripts are indeed very platform independent. ... > reason why the
FreeBSD ports infrastructure needs to play so many ... the reason the Ports go through
all the hoops you see is that they ... One other reason is, of course, the fact that the autotools
have changed ... (freebsd-questions) - Re: Why people use this style of javascript declaration?
... The reason is historical. ... Netscape 2.x, and it did not support external
.js files, only scripts ... Respectively tag was added to HTML specs as the one
requiring ... the external .js file executed and inline content ignored. ... (comp.lang.javascript) - Re: SharedCLibrary version
... The guard could be there for a very good reason. ... any RMEnsures. ...
If however a programmer, for whatever reason, decides not to use ... platforms he
wants to support. ... (comp.sys.acorn.programmer)