Re: perl and ports
From: Kris Kennaway (kris_at_obsecurity.org)
Date: 01/25/05
- Previous message: Christian Hiris: "Re: What's on each FreeBSD 5.3 (i386) disc?"
- In reply to: Gert Cuykens: "Re: perl and ports"
- Next in thread: Paul Schmehl: "Re: perl and ports"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:29:04 -0800 To: Gert Cuykens <gert.cuykens@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:26:07AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:53:01 -0800, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:30:05PM +1000, Warren wrote:
> > > On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 03:28 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > > > does cvsup need perl ?
> > >
> > > Yes
> >
> > Only to compile it from ports, not to run the resulting package.
> >
> > Kris
> >
>
> this is what i dont understand only need perl to compile it ?
>
> so some pakeges need perl to compile and some dont ? why not make them
> all perl independent ?
It's not up to us - if the third-party software requires a port to
build, that's what it needs.
Kris
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Christian Hiris: "Re: What's on each FreeBSD 5.3 (i386) disc?"
- In reply to: Gert Cuykens: "Re: perl and ports"
- Next in thread: Paul Schmehl: "Re: perl and ports"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|