Re: 5.8TB RAID5 SATA Array Questions - UPDATE
From: Tomas Quintero (tomasq_at_gmail.com)
Date: 04/26/05
- Previous message: Edgar Martinez: "RE: 5.8TB RAID5 SATA Array Questions - UPDATE"
- In reply to: Edgar Martinez: "RE: 5.8TB RAID5 SATA Array Questions - UPDATE"
- Next in thread: Edgar Martinez: "RE: 5.8TB RAID5 SATA Array Questions - UPDATE"
- Reply: Edgar Martinez: "RE: 5.8TB RAID5 SATA Array Questions - UPDATE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:05:35 -0400 To: emartinez@crockettint.com
I am almost a bit curious why you didn't go with a Microsoft based
solution in a situation like this, where you are needing to provide
SMB based file sharing to obviously Windows client desktops.
Another solution would be to setup a dedicated NAS of some sort. But I
suppose it's too late for all of that.
On 4/25/05, Edgar Martinez <emartinez@crockettint.com> wrote:
> No flaming here, when dealing with projects this big, you cannot be bias
> obviously because generally it is someone else's time and money that is on
> the line. Thanks for the info, I didn't know the whole second array thing,
> that would explain some of the weirdness that I have been seeing.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brent Wiese [mailto:brently@bjwcs.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 12:54 PM
> To: emartinez@crockettint.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: RE: 5.8TB RAID5 SATA Array Questions - UPDATE
>
> > Any one else think they know of a better method??
>
> Well, I'm probably going to get totally flamed for this, but since you
> asked...
>
> The better method is to install Windows 2003 Server. Assemble your drives
> into 2TB or less RAID5 volumes (btw, you only want 1 per 3Ware card, more on
> that in a second) and use Windows 2003 to span those volumes. It'll show up
> as one drive after that. There is some limit, but I can't remember what it
> is. Its huge though.
>
> And in case you didn't know, 3Ware cards are only speed-optimized for the
> first array. Subsequent arrays on a card run painfully slow. They won't say
> it in any of their lit, but if you corner their support people, they'll
> admit it (it obvious if you try it).
>
> Sorry to mention M$ here, but it sounds like you invested incredible amounts
> of time, and even Windows 2003 can be cheaper than your time at some point.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
-- -Tomas Quintero _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Edgar Martinez: "RE: 5.8TB RAID5 SATA Array Questions - UPDATE"
- In reply to: Edgar Martinez: "RE: 5.8TB RAID5 SATA Array Questions - UPDATE"
- Next in thread: Edgar Martinez: "RE: 5.8TB RAID5 SATA Array Questions - UPDATE"
- Reply: Edgar Martinez: "RE: 5.8TB RAID5 SATA Array Questions - UPDATE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|