Re: mixing IDE and SATA hard drives on a FreeBSD system

From: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC (chad_at_shire.net)
Date: 05/05/05

  • Next message: Valerio Daelli: "Linux Perl Program not working"
    Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 06:16:42 -0600
    To: FreeBSD Questions <questions@freebsd.org>
    
    

    On May 4, 2005, at 10:15 PM, jason henson wrote:

    > Chuck Robey wrote:
    >
    >
    >> David Kelly wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 03:22:25PM -0500, Andrew L. Gould wrote:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>> I was thinking about putting FreeBSD and swap on the ATA100 IDE
    >>>> hard drive and installing a SATA hard drive for home and
    >>>> database data. Is there any reason I shouldn't mix hard drive
    >>>> types? (I've never messed with SATA before.)
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> I have one PATA with FreeBSD installed, and two SATA striped with
    >>> gvinum. Swap spread across all 3. No particular problems. The SATA
    >>> drives are fairly recent models in 160G, the PATA is prior
    >>> generation in
    >>> 120G, all Hitachi. The SATA drives seem to handle seeks from
    >>> multiple
    >>> processes better than the PATA, better even than might expect from
    >>> striping.
    >>>
    >>> At about 4500 hours of runtime one SATA drive developed a bad block
    >>> which the drive firmware was not able to automagically
    >>> substitute. gvinum
    >>> shut down.
    >>>
    >>> I see no reason why a SATA drive should be less reliable than a PATA
    >>> drive. Also remember back when one could purchase the same drive
    >>> hardware in either PATA or SCSI, so find it hard to accept the
    >>> interface
    >>> makes much difference in reliability.
    >>>
    >>>
    >> I don't know why it's true... I can state that I've had 3 of them
    >> so far, and had troubles with 2, and google is chock full of
    >> reports. Further, the info about them being the same as their IDE
    >> brethren isn't true, at least, the access rate specifications are
    >> higher for SATA drives, in general, as compared to IDE. Least
    >> they were the last time I checked, maybe it's changed inthe last 6
    >> months.
    >>
    >> OTOH, when I first bought mine, I was comparing in my mind with
    >> SCSI, not IDE, maybe they *do* compare equally with IDE, is IDE
    >> that bad? Certainly, SATA is less reliable thant he scsi drives.
    >>
    >>
    > Don't compare IDE to SCSI. IDE is home/consumer grade. SCSI is
    > commercial/enterprise grade. Just look at the price differences,
    > because you most certainly get what you pay for with SCSI compared
    > to IDE.
    >
    > **Warning, the following contains anecdotal evidence**
    > I built a new rig for my brother with SATA and it has been
    > perfect. I only have IDE in my slightly older machine which runs
    > great 24/7. But this has just been my experience, as always YMMV.
    > One last thing, I would avoid the first generation of most
    > technology because they tend to still have some bugs. So if you
    > buy SATA don't et the discounted drive, look for a newer model and
    > you should be good. Also checkout storagereview.com
    >

    Most of the first generation SATA drives were actually PATA (aka IDE)
    drives with a separate SATA <-> PATA converter added (at the board
    level). Some newer SATA drives have native SATA interfaces and it is
    possible that the manufacturers do not make a PATA version of the
    same drive, but in most cases, SATA drives have PATA brethren and
    these PATA brethren have the same mechanisms. There are exceptions,
    and the WD Raptor series of SATA drives are more like SCSI in terms
    of performance and MTBF numbers, and they were designed for the same
    market as the lower end enterprise SCSI drives.

    Chad

    ---
    Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
    Your Web App and Email hosting provider
    chad@shire.net
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Valerio Daelli: "Linux Perl Program not working"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: External Drive Dock to Allow Hotswap SCSI to Attach by USB?
      ... I have SCSI on the box and USB 1.0. ... If I can use a SCSI device that cuts down to two hours. ... Maybe you can do it with two converters, SCSI to IDE and IDE to SATA ... SATA drives on IDE controllers. ...
      (comp.arch.storage)
    • Re: Difference between IDE and SCSI ??
      ... for me, but to either give me reassurance that all three, IDE, PATA and ... SCSI are exactly the same thing and can be used interchangeably on a ... There are physical differences that you would have to keep straight if you had both when connecting cables and telling your bios which to boot. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Apple or Windows
      ... >> newer 10,000RPM SATA drives SCSI is simply not worth the extra cost. ... At one time you could buy exactly the same drive mechanism with IDE or ... cheap disks available with SCSI. ...
      (rec.photo.digital)
    • Re: Add an IDE HD to a SATA Vista64 Set-up
      ... Now I have an IDE HD that I would like to add to my set-up. ... adapter I can use that is compatible with Vista? ... New SATA drives are better than any IDE so my advice is this: ... Bad boy yardies are supposed to know how to get rid of bodies. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.vista.hardware_devices)
    • Re: Dell/Linux vs. Apple Xserve for file server?
      ... >> As much as I like Apple for desktop, they're a bit spendy for server ... Based on what I have read so far, SATA drives perform slower than IDE drives on ... outboard RAID controller). ...
      (comp.unix.admin)