Re: I need further HDD advice before submitting order.

freebsd.org_at_donnacha.com
Date: 05/11/05

  • Next message: David Bear: "user owned groups"
    Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 18:02:28 +0100
    To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
    
    

    Wow, I just got an email from my host saying they'd gone ahead and set
    up my server without waiting for my instructions.

    I logged in using the details they sent and found that they've set it up
    as follows:

    Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
    /dev/ad0s1a 507630 35424 431596 8% /
    devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev
    /dev/ad2s1f 15231278 525930 13486846 4% /usr
    /dev/ad2s1e 5077038 548 4670328 0% /var
    /dev/ad0s1e 72802358 44 66978126 0% /home
    /dev/ad0s1d 507630 6 467014 0% /tmp
    /dev/ad2s1d 507630 6 467014 0% /var/tmp
    /dev/ad2s1g 168392416 4 154921020 0% /www

    Definitely very different from the configuration I've been moving
    towards - only 5GB for /var, almost 170GB for a directory I hadn't even
    considered, /www, not sure what they've allocated to swap.

    Damn. Should I try to reconfigure this or ask them to do a fresh
    install according to my instructions?

    I'm a bit worried because there might be elements of what they've
    included here that are necessary.

    Should I be including things like /dev in my instructions or isn't that
    implicit?

    Any and all advice VERY much appreciated,

    Thanks,

    Donnacha

    freebsd.org@donnacha.com wrote:
    > Hi again,
    >
    > I posted a question here last week, asking for advice on how I should
    > ask my datacenter to divide up the HDDs in my new server. Thank you to
    > everyone who responded.
    >
    > I have tried to understand all the advice given and, since then, have
    > tried to get myself up to speed by reading the relevant sections in The
    > Complete FreeBSD, FreeBSD Unleashed, Absolute BSD and Teach Yourself
    > FreeBSD in 24 Hours (it didn't).
    >
    > I understand a little more than I did but am still unsure as to how I
    > should divide the HDDs and would very much appreciate reactions to my
    > current proposal.
    >
    > ----------
    >
    > Server purpose: Initially just forums, later sundry other Web apps i.e.
    > ecommerce, ticket bookings etc. Will possibly become a heavy-duty email
    > server at some stage.
    >
    > 2GB RAM
    >
    > 80GB HDD IDE:
    > / = 1GB
    > /usr = 15GB
    > /local = 15GB
    > Swap = 4GB
    > Unallocated = 40GB
    >
    > 200GB HDD IDE:
    >
    > /tmp = 2GB (is that enough?)
    > /home = 28GB
    > /var = 100GB (will inclube the forum databases etc)
    > Unallocated = 70GB
    >
    > I'll be asking them to put the both disks in dangerously dedicated mode,
    > with each on a different IDE bus.
    >
    >
    > ----------
    >
    > Is it a good idea leaving so much unallocated space? My research
    > suggests that this may be useful for moving directories around or giving
    > specific subdirectories their own partition at a later date when I have
    > a better idea of usage, does that sound right?
    >
    > The only problem about creating partitions at a later date is that I
    > will have command line access only, I'm not even sure if I can create
    > partitions at a later date, I think that for sysinstall I might actually
    > have to be there. Can anyone advise me on this?
    >
    > Swap: As the second disk will have the presumably quite busy /tmp and
    > /var, placing all the swap on this the first disk, rather than shared
    > between both, could help to balance the load a bit (thanks to Henry
    > Miller for that suggestion). With 2GB of RAM, I'm hoping the Swap won't
    > be needed very often anyway; if it is, I may simply add more memory.
    >
    > I decided not to use GPT because, although it sounds great, it seems a
    > little complicated for a newbie like me.
    >
    > Apologies for seeking your help once again, I just need to get this
    > straight before submitting the order, I would be very grateful for any
    > and all advice.
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > Donnacha
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
    > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
    > To unsubscribe, send any mail to
    > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: David Bear: "user owned groups"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Basic NT4 to w2k3 migration questions
      ... > The easiest way and the least disruptive is to upgrade your existing PDC ... If you can't do that then use the "advice". ... >> hardware and then upgrading it to w2k3 which sounds a bit idiotic to me. ... This includes a Windows 2003 Exchance server. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.migration)
    • Re: Basic NT4 to w2k3 migration questions
      ... The easiest way and the least disruptive is to upgrade your existing PDC ... If you can't do that then use the "advice". ... > hardware and then upgrading it to w2k3 which sounds a bit idiotic to me. ... This includes a Windows 2003 Exchance server. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.migration)
    • seeking linux gateway/router/proxy/firewall advice
      ... wanted to run this by them for a sanity check / advice. ... i'd like to have a single linux box provide these services. ... use dhcp to get an ip addrs, hostname, and dns info from the DSL ISP. ... if i want to run a DHCP server on the internal network to ...
      (linux.redhat.install)
    • Re: Deploy a webserver?
      ... I have a spare OS & the box that we have currently running our subdomain will make a splendid ISA Server. ... We may consider hosting member portals/sites in the future. ... Information conveyed here is intended as advice and is offered without warranty. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: [SLE] Novell server with Suse
      ... On Tuesday 14 June 2005 20:07, Mike Dewhirst wrote: ... > titles so I can figure out how to migrate my company to Linux file servers. ... > We also have a Windows 2000 Terminal Server machine to permit remote ... > Any advice will be very much appreciated. ...
      (SuSE)