Re: NFS read-ahead?
From: Emanuel Strobl (Emanuel.strobl_at_gmx.net)
Date: 05/17/05
- Previous message: Eugene Hercun: "Re: highpoint rocketraid 454 - RAID 1"
- In reply to: Andrea Venturoli: "Re: NFS read-ahead?"
- Next in thread: Andrea Venturoli: "Re: NFS read-ahead?"
- Reply: Andrea Venturoli: "Re: NFS read-ahead?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 15:08:31 +0200
Am Montag, 16. Mai 2005 16:44 schrieb Andrea Venturoli:
> Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > Offhand, not really, but if you look around via google for
> > mount_nfs freebsd "-r" a lot of people suggest r=32768,-w=32768.
> > Perhaps use that as a starting point and experiment to see what gives
> > you the best performance for your situation.
>
> Tried this: with simple tests it doesn't seem to make any difference.
> I guess I'll have to investigate further.
> Thanks for now.
Try using TCP instead of UDP, this improoved throughput with large files a
lot for me! Even without touching read and write sizes.
-Harry
>
> bye
> av.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Eugene Hercun: "Re: highpoint rocketraid 454 - RAID 1"
- In reply to: Andrea Venturoli: "Re: NFS read-ahead?"
- Next in thread: Andrea Venturoli: "Re: NFS read-ahead?"
- Reply: Andrea Venturoli: "Re: NFS read-ahead?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|