Re: nfs: fstab or automount
From: Lowell Gilbert (freebsd-questions-local_at_be-well.ilk.org)
Date: 05/23/05
- Previous message: Lowell Gilbert: "Re: Confused with Refuse"
- In reply to: Ryan Winograd: "nfs: fstab or automount"
- Next in thread: Tony Shadwick: "Re: nfs: fstab or automount/thread hijack"
- Reply: Tony Shadwick: "Re: nfs: fstab or automount/thread hijack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Ryan Winograd <rylwin@houston.rr.com> Date: 23 May 2005 11:40:20 -0400
Ryan Winograd <rylwin@houston.rr.com> writes:
> If I set up a network in which the /home directory is shared to all
> client computers, is it better to have the clients mount the nfs share
> in fstab or to let automount handle the mounting? What are the pros
> and cons of each?
An automounter can let you mount each individual user's home directory
only as needed (and dismount it when it's not being used.). If you're
going to mount the whole tree, with the home directories for *all* of
the users, then you might as well do it once at the start and be done
with it.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Lowell Gilbert: "Re: Confused with Refuse"
- In reply to: Ryan Winograd: "nfs: fstab or automount"
- Next in thread: Tony Shadwick: "Re: nfs: fstab or automount/thread hijack"
- Reply: Tony Shadwick: "Re: nfs: fstab or automount/thread hijack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|