Re: strange network behaviour

From: Nathan Kinkade (nkinkade_at_ub.edu.bz)
Date: 06/06/05

  • Next message: Vic FreeBSD: "Fwd: Re: [R] Unable to compile R-2.1.0"
    Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:16:28 -0600
    To: ben@stonehenge-net.com
    
    
    

    On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:46:33AM -0700, ben@stonehenge-net.com wrote:
    > on Friday i set up 4 old celeron boxes as DNS servers for a client. after
    > about 5 minutes, their ability to reach the network vanishes... they can't
    > ping their router, and inbound network traffic vanishes. rebooting fixes
    > the problem... for another ~ 5 min.
    >
    > the only things running are chrooted bind, postfix, and webmin. ipfw is
    > on, with firewall_type="open". i've also tried it with ipfw disabled.
    >
    > The same thing happens with my laptop, which is also running 5-STABLE as
    > of about noon on friday.
    >
    > I know this sounds like a network issue, but is there anything in the
    > system that might cause thist type of behavior? it doesn't seem to be the
    > hardware - my laptop is a pentium M centrino system with a bg nic, and
    > they're old Celeron 500 machines with fxp nics.
    >
    > the kernel config is attached, in case i've done something really stupid
    > in there
    >
    > thanks,
    >
    > ben

    What is your default rule for IPFW? I once had a similar problem in a
    setup that included an IPFW machine in bridge mode. I would turn on the
    firewall and everything worked fine for about 5 or 10 minutes,
    after which everything broke down. The setup looked like this:

    [gateway (cisco)] <--> [ipfw (bridge mode)] <--> [internal net]

    It turns out what was happening was that the ipfw machine running
    in bridge mode with a default rule of deny was not allowing ARP requests
    to pass between the gateway and the internal net. As soon as the ARP
    entries expired on the internal net, access to the external network
    broke down because ARP lookups for the gateways IP address were failing
    because of the IPFW machine. In the end we had to set the default IPFW
    rule to accept and add two rules before that denying any TCP or UDP
    packets.

    I'm not sure if this has anything to do with your situation, but I
    though I'd throw it out there as one possiblity that involves IPFW.

    Nathan

    
    



  • Next message: Vic FreeBSD: "Fwd: Re: [R] Unable to compile R-2.1.0"

    Relevant Pages

    • ipfw optimization on slow computers?
      ... I'm running FreeBSD on a pretty slow machine as the home's network router. ... but I have a suspicion that I could get faster internal network ... no idle CPU % on the server, even though the idle CPU % is very high when ... is there a way I can get my ipfw config file to ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
    • Re: Bandwidth Monitoring program
      ... periodically harvest and reset the counters via a cron job and ... You can then prepare tables and charts ... I seriously doubt his router can run it, and what good is it going to do him to run it on a machine on the network if the network is switched? ... run ipfw in layer 2 after turning on promiscuous mode and attaching it to a hub. ...
      (freebsd-net)
    • Re: ipfw,ipf
      ... but what is the difference between ipfw and ipf ... > Seting up your firewall is easy to do... ... You can protect just one host, or an entire network. ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
    • Re: rc.order wrong (ipfw)
      ... what sense does it makes logging while syslog is not up? ... What would it forward & log when network isn't up? ... Remember that, by default, until ipfw starts, there is a default ...
      (freebsd-stable)