Re: Explaining FreeBSD features

From: Lei Sun (lei.sun_at_gmail.com)
Date: 06/22/05

  • Next message: Björn König: "Re: pkg_info question"
    Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:48:49 -0700
    To: questions@freebsd.org
    
    

    After all, someone is trying to do something good for freebsd, by
    making freebsd known by more and more people.

    Most people are lazy, we tend to prefer immediate results rather than
    a long term process and commitment. I think this is understandable.

    Of course, there will be a lot of newbies coming, some of them will
    stay and some of them will find it too difficult, and leave. That's
    the way it is.

    Same goes with linux. If it just sounds powerful, and hard for people
    to get their hands dirty by just setting one up and see what it looks
    like and maybe how it works, then linux wouldn't be this popular now.

    You would hear that "Someone has burned a linux CD and just don't have
    time to install it, but linux is easy and sounds really cool and makes
    people curious", and you wouldn't hear the same thing about freebsd.
    Most of the none unix IT friends I have all had a "EXTREMELY HARD"
    impression on Freebsd, and they found linux extremely easy.

    That's indeed not true. It really only takes a normal person several
    hours to flip through the HANDBOOK to at least know his/her way
    around, and this is really as "easy" as linux.

    But, it make sence, that people would like to see the product, before
    using it or even know more about it. Much like a person would prefer
    trying out a service for free before he/she decides to invest more
    money and time into it.

    Also, one must first be a newbie in something, then become more and
    more professional while he/she is learning.

    A lot of you might be good at Freebsd, but very new to something else.
    Would you prefer to hear someone telling you, "Hey! This is only for
    Professional! There is not even a newbie version for you! So don't
    slow us down by getting out of our way!" That's not friendly at all,
    right?

    I perfectly agree that Freebsd is a serious OS from serious people,
    that's why I choose freebsd :) and I would rather see freebsd be more
    and more popular than linux!!! Truely!!! It is indeed a very good OS.

    So let's be nice, and find ways help the new comers without disturbing
    the ones, who are not interested in the easy questions, instead of
    turning them away.

    We all love FreeBSD, don't we?

    Lei
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Björn König: "Re: pkg_info question"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: FreeBSD 4.x Opteron Question
      ... the FreeBSD developers told everyone that 5.3 was da ... initially over linux not because there's a bunch of good guys on the ... My tests measure kernel performance; ... > a networking device is a key performance indicator. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Newbie Experience
      ... I've only been around since FreeBSD 5.4 ... FreeBSD kernel too. ... always sunshine and linux is farts. ... in the hey day of AT&T Unix I'm ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Review of FreeBSD 5.4
      ... but not less problems compared to FreeBSD. ... If you like to have a bleeding edge system using debian --- just go ... > the linux kernel suffers. ... When the kernel suffers, everyone who uses ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
    • Re: FreeBSD & Linux distro
      ... as a FreeBSD advocacy the tone of the article should be neutral and all ... do not like Linux and more over I have never used it in my life but I ... Statement of the type BSD appears more stable than Linux is ... fewer FreeBSD advocates make claims like that, however, is part of the ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Compare Linux and Freebsd Redux
      ... >> Perhaps the most unsettling 'misinformation' about the FreeBSD vs. ... >> Linux situation was the spin that Linux was somehow more 'open', ... >> the official Linux tree... ... your own distribution is that the FreeBSD distribution is/was already ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)