Re: SMP and networking under FreeBSD 5.3

From: Joe (josepha48_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 06/24/05

  • Next message: martin_at_orbweavers.co.uk: "Re: firewall on FreeBSD"
    Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
    To: Alex Zbyslaw <xfb52@dial.pipex.com>
    
    

    Hello,

    ps:

    root 542 0.0 0.7 1320 812 ?? Ss Tue09AM 2:22.10
    /sbin/natd -dynamic -d -log_ipfw_denied -log_denied -dynamic -n
    dc0

    ifconfig:
    pccard_ifconfig="NO"
    ifconfig_xl0="inet 192.168.0.15 netmask 255.255.255.0"
    ifconfig_dc0="DHCP"

    So FreeBSD 5.3 isn't production? I had read somewhere that
    5.2.1 wasn't production and that 5.3 was supposed to be
    production.

    I'll look into upgrading to 5.4, it will take a bit of time to
    do that though.

    Joe

    --- Alex Zbyslaw <xfb52@dial.pipex.com> wrote:

    > Joe wrote:
    >
    > >Okay, I've been looking and looking for duplicate natd's.
    > >
    > >I have the /etc/rc.conf which has natd stuff below, and the
    > only
    > >other place I see it is in ipfw.
    > >
    > >I was able to change my rc and use /etc/rc.d/natd start and
    > that
    > >works. Which is better as it does not require me to reload
    > my
    > >firewall rules.
    > >
    > >I still don't know why natd refuses to start the first time
    > when
    > >called from ipfw.
    > >
    > >
    > If I understand the boot procedure correctly, natd ought to be
    > started
    > as part of the /etc/rc.d/ipfw and that just calls
    > "/etc/rc.d/natd start"
    > which is what you are typing later from the command line with
    > success,
    > so why it fails at boot, I really don't know at this point.
    >
    > The "cannot bind to divert socket" error I thought could
    > happen if a)
    > you weren't root (seems unlikely from bootup) or b) something
    > had
    > already bound the socket. After your machine boots, what does
    > ps uagxww | egrep natd
    > show?
    >
    > Google also found this:
    >
    > >- In FreeBSD, IPDIVERT must be enabled at compile time.
    > >
    > I guess your kernel has this option, or natd would never have
    > worked.
    >
    > what ifconfig lines do you have in /etc.rc.conf
    >
    > egrep ifconfig /etc/rc.conf
    >
    > >I have no rc.conf.local
    > >
    > >
    > Not too surprising. It could be used under 4.X as a second
    > level to
    > rc.conf, but exists nowadays for backwards compatibility and
    > AFAIK isn't
    > created by anything.
    >
    > As a more drastic attempt at a solution, could you try
    > upgrading to
    > 5.4? It has numerous improvements over 5.3, which was never a
    >
    > production release. Maybe some ordering problems was fixed.
    >
    > --Alex
    >
    >

                    
    ____________________________________________________
    Yahoo! Sports
    Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football
    http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: martin_at_orbweavers.co.uk: "Re: firewall on FreeBSD"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Disable console Ethernet on GS140?
      ... You need to turn your production system into a more logical-name enabled ... boot time before starting them, ... I will have a second (actually a third - there's two production ES40s ...
      (comp.os.vms)
    • Re: Programming an Image into flash
      ... Your thought of programming the .bin file directly is probably ... > longer to load into RAM at boot since you will be decoding records instead ... None of the BSPs MS provided have a boot from ... > that MS is primarily focused on a development bootloader, not a production ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsce.platbuilder)
    • Re: Copy Drive
      ... like to safely make an exact copy of this drive and boot it up on another ... Now you will know the backups work and can test until you ... know it is ok to attempt a production install. ... Hook your system into the production network and use rsync to bring ...
      (alt.linux)
    • Re: Trying to boot old, old system
      ... >I trying to boot a very old, unused for years SCO OpenServer ... We still have a P75 in production, ...
      (comp.unix.sco.misc)