Re: Did we must put the mounted partition '/' and '/boot' in the same slice ?
From: Alex Zbyslaw (xfb52_at_dial.pipex.com)
Date: 07/08/05
- Previous message: Alex Zbyslaw: "Re: Problems since 5.3-RELEASE-p15"
- In reply to: Shark Wang: "Re: Did we must put the mounted partition '/' and '/boot' in the same slice ?"
- Next in thread: Shark Wang: "Re: Did we must put the mounted partition '/' and '/boot' in the same slice ?"
- Reply: Shark Wang: "Re: Did we must put the mounted partition '/' and '/boot' in the same slice ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:18:54 +0100 To: Shark Wang <sharkwang@gmail.com>
Shark Wang wrote:
>as I had read some partitions material about legacy Unix, I try to
>separate '/boot' from '/' for my large space on '/' .
>
>another question come up : Is ad0s1d the first blocks of the disk which
>based on partitions layout that my gave?
>
>
>
No, it isn't. ad0s1a would be the first blocks after the MBR. Really,
FreeBSD does not need or expect /boot to be separate so would not have
put it at the front of the disk. The only system I know which does that
is Linux. Out of curiosity, which "legacy Unix"?
--Alex
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Alex Zbyslaw: "Re: Problems since 5.3-RELEASE-p15"
- In reply to: Shark Wang: "Re: Did we must put the mounted partition '/' and '/boot' in the same slice ?"
- Next in thread: Shark Wang: "Re: Did we must put the mounted partition '/' and '/boot' in the same slice ?"
- Reply: Shark Wang: "Re: Did we must put the mounted partition '/' and '/boot' in the same slice ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
