Question about packages

From: Milscvaer (millueradfa_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/29/05

  • Next message: Erik Nørgaard: "Re: fwcontrol: unknown format 0x1e"
    Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
    To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
    
    

    Hello,

    I have question about packages. I would like to
    upgrade some packages on my FreeBSD 5.4 system to the
    latest versions avialable in ports, but I would like
    to upgrade using binary packages and not compile them
    from ports (using portupgrade -PP -R package). How
    often are the binary packages in 5-stable for instance
    rebuilt to the latest version? It is pretty critical
    to keep these updated constantly, preferably every
    day, to get the latest security fixes in a new version
    of a package. I noticed that Firefox still seems to be
    at 1.0.6 even though 1.0.7 has been out for several
    days. Does FreeBSD have a system set up where when a
    port is upgraded to a new version, the binary package
    for the port is automatically rebuilt soon after, such
    as at least within the next day so that the latest
    version in ports is also avialable as a binary
    package. This is very essential. I hope such a feature
    can be provided.

    Does also, is anything done to avoid the situation
    where an older program needs an older version of a
    dependancies and a newer program needs a newer version
    of the same depedancy? The way, currently, that I
    believe we avoid the
    DLL-hell situation on FreeBSD, where a new program
    would install a new version of a library, blowing up
    older programs on the system that used an older
    version of the same library, being
    incompatable with the new version, is to append a
    version number to every .so file in the lib
    directories, and have all programs to a specific
    version of a library, such as one program may use
    mylib.so.1.0 while a new program might use
    mylib.so.2.0. Thus if a new program needs a new
    version of a library, it can be installed and use the
    new version, but all older programs can continue to
    use the old version.

    Does portupgrade leave older versions of a library
    dependancy in place when installing a new version of
    such a dependancy, so that applications that require
    the newer version of the dependancy can use the new
    version, while applications that need the older
    version can use the older version?

    thank you very much,
    Alistar

    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
    http://mail.yahoo.com
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Erik Nørgaard: "Re: fwcontrol: unknown format 0x1e"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Upgrading to 7.0 - stupid requirements
      ... >> matter what I do with the packages, ... >> after upgrade to a new version. ... It passed two days from portupgrade -faP, ... upgrading the installed ports: ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • Re: Getting started with FreeBSD
      ... My opinion of FreeBSD is do not try to configure X-11 desktops and apps with it. ... the relationship between ports, packages and security. ... You can install the same metapackage in any Unix OS, if you love the bloat--uh, I mean functionality--or use another DE/WM to navigate around your desktop. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Reinstalling, then upgrading (Was Re: Salvageable? (Was Re: make installworld error))
      ... > repository of packages for FreeBSD. ... > merely upgrade those packages necessary for the latest kernel, ... "installworld" are all part of the same upgrade procedure (which ... Ports" for a full explanation. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Total Newbie
      ... manage than Linux systems. ... And that however painful rebuilding very big and complex ports may be at ... through providing mainly prebuilt packages ... FreeBSD is much more open about the choice. ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
    • Re: Total Newbie
      ... manage than Linux systems. ... And that however painful rebuilding very big and complex ports may be at ... through providing mainly prebuilt packages ... FreeBSD is much more open about the choice. ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)