Re: Dell PowerEdge w/ Intel AFT / Broadcom BASP

From: Brian A. Seklecki (lavalamp_at_spiritual-machines.org)
Date: 10/06/05

  • Next message: Dave: "Re: bruteforceblocker + PF"
    Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 16:24:00 -0400 (EDT)
    To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
    
    

    For the record on this, Dell claims that AFT/ALB is entirely software
    based.

    On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:

    > All:
    >
    > This may be better for freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org, but that list is kind of
    > ghost town, and this question is more a standards-based:
    >
    > Does anyone deploy Dell Poweredge in a HA configuration utilizing these
    > features?
    >
    > http://www.intel.com/network/connectivity/resources/technologies/load_balancing.htm
    > http://www1.us.dell.com/content/topics/global.aspx/power/en/ps1q03_bhutani?c=us&cs=555&l=en&s=biz
    > http://www.broadcom.com/drivers/faq_drivers.php#55
    >
    > Do we know what underlying standards and protocols compose these
    > "technologies"? 802.3ad, Cisco FEC?
    >
    > Intel AFT claims to provide redundancy over a "team" of NICs. ALB claims
    > link aggregation; but they don't specify if they're doing it in hardware or
    > sofware (see Below)
    >
    > Broadcom BASP claims the same, given different terminology and vendor.
    >
    > I'm looking for a "fault tolerant" configuration for a HA cluster. "Load
    > balancing" and/or "link aggregation" is not required. I need to be able to
    > "team" two NICs into one Virtual NIC. Each NIC connects to two redundant
    > managed switches, on which the connecting switch ports exist in the same VLAN
    > (which is then ISL/802.1q trunked between them). Essentially
    > the same ethernet segment.
    >
    > I see ng_one2many(4), but the man page doesn't really state what standard
    > that uses. It seems to be all in-kernel magic (LACP and 802.3.ad aren't
    > mentioned in the man page); will this meet the above requirements?
    >
    > There were some ng_one2many(4) patches a while back to add more intellegence,
    > (FEC/802.3ad heartbeat like control protocol)
    >
    > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=107695977400002&r=1&w=2
    > ...but no mention of them ever being commited.
    >
    > I see ng_fec(4) also, but I don't think that Cisco Ethernet Channel can occur
    > between two switches and one server (correct me if I'm wrong).
    >
    > I question the Hardware v.s. Software issue on the Intel NICs becase the Dell
    > PowerEdges Severs that happen to have Intel NIC Chipsets using em(4) (many
    > have Broadcom), seem to automatically try to "team" NICs when they're
    > connected to unmanaged PowerConnect switches, breaking ng_one2many logic.
    > They constantly alternate MAC addresses between the primary ethernet, the
    > secondary ethernet, and a 3rd 1-byte-off Virtual MAC.
    >
    > This automatic attempt to team seems like a hardware feature. If it was a
    > software feature, in theory it wouldn't try to team w/o being instructed to?
    >
    > On the other hand, *managed* Dell PowerConnect switches feature something
    > called "LAG", which the docs describe as 802.3ad / LACP.
    >
    > I haven't tried ng_one2many on non-Dell or Dell Managed switches to see if
    > the MAC address "bouncing" problem persists, but I'll try that today.
    >
    > So the big question:
    >
    > *) Is the Windows/Linux-only software for configuring "teams" of NICs,
    > described in the URLs below, designed to configure a hardware level
    > feature that might have more intellegent link failure detection than
    > ng_many2one? (I.e., other than just lost carrier, say, STP storm
    > detection or excessive packet error thresholds). Or is it software?
    >
    > *) If it is a hardware feature, could our em(4) driver be adapted or
    > could it possibly be configured using OpenManage via the Intel
    > IPMI/DMI/SMI whatever?
    >
    > *) Can Cisco FEC or 802.3ad provide reundancy between two switches and
    > one server w/ two NICs? Will NetGraph ever have a 802.3ad module?
    >
    > *) What combination of Switch and NIC related teaming / failover technology
    > are known to be compatible with FreeBSD ?
    >
    > TIA,
    > ~BAS
    >

    l8*
             -lava

    x.25 - minix - bitnet - plan9 - 110 bps - ASR 33 - base8
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Dave: "Re: bruteforceblocker + PF"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: The Dell Effect (Was: Re: Will OpenVMS I64 ...)
      ... > than the cost of similar HP hardware. ... > the system (hardware and software) may be more or less. ... Dell doesn't have the dinausaur distribution system called "the channel". ... features you'd be forced to get on an HP model where your desired feature is ...
      (comp.os.vms)
    • Re: Windows XP compatible with my existing computer
      ... The XP CD has a feature on it that will check compatibility for both hardware and software. ... If you have the CD already and your Dell is still useable with another version of Windows, pop the CD in, let it autorun and select the option on screen to test compatibility. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: SAS-Controler für NetWare
      ... Rahmen, einfach ein Raid aus einem Server rausnehmen, und in einen ... Dell) labeln einfach ... Apropos Management: Auch in dem Bereich ist HP absolut konkurrenzlos. ... Meine Erfahrungen mit Dell Server Hardware und dem Support dazu, ...
      (de.comp.sys.novell)
    • Re: Saw 10.4.1 Running On a PC Laptop Today
      ... way for the software sales to be high enough to make up for losing the hardware ... And they would rather pay $200 for a site license for Windows rather than pay an extra $1000 for an "Apple" machine even tho the OS is so much cheaper and more elegant than Windows. ... Even home users, when faced with a choice between a $600 Dell with XP Home Edition, and $1800+ for an "Apple" machine with OSX, almost ALWAYS choose the $600 Dell, even tho the "Apple" platform is so much more beautiful. ...
      (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
    • Re: Time for a new server
      ... had to do this and I'm very out of touch with the hardware market. ... We've used Dell in the past, and comparing the Dell and IBM machines ... servers. ...
      (uk.comp.os.linux)