Re: fxp0 problem with 6Beta?

From: Bdrawyah (bdrawyah_at_bdrawyah.plus.com)
Date: 10/09/05

  • Next message: Michael Lednev: "Re: portmanager"
    To: bdrawyah@bdrawyah.plus.com, 'Brian A.Seklecki' <lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org>
    Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 20:07:06 +0100
    
    
    ('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) On Sun Oct 9 16:58 , 'Brian A. Seklecki' <lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org> sent:
    >Process of elimination:
    >
    >Q: On the same hardware this problem doesn't occur with an older
    >version, correct?
    Installed 5.3 on 0.7, problem remains. 0.5 runs 5.4 incidentally.
    Changed the router identification protocol direction on 0.1 from "None" to "Both" (RIP version is 1) to
    no effect.
    Returned the router to the default settings to no effect (other than losing connection to the internet
    ).
    Router is Netgear 834G running V2.10.22 as of Oct 6.

    >What you need to do is have two terminals open on either machine. One
    >for ping'ing, one for watching tcpdump(8) on. You want to look for ARP
    >"who-as" and "is at" packets on either side.
    >
    Tricky if you want me to have 2 monitors each running 2 terminals since 0.7 was only ever supposed to
    be a remotely administered bit of fun!
    Here are some ping/tcpdump results:
    0.5 pings 0.1
    17:32:51.810068 arp who-has 192.168.0.5 tell 192.168.0.1
    17:32:51.810138 arp reply 192.168.0.5 is-at 4c:00:10:74:ac:56
    17:32:51.864133 IP 192.168.0.5 > 192.168.0.1: icmp 64: echo request seq 5
    17:32:51.864733 IP 192.168.0.1 > 192.168.0.5: icmp 64: echo reply seq 5
    17:32:52.872471 IP 192.168.0.5 > 192.168.0.1: icmp 64: echo request seq 6
    17:32:52.873167 IP 192.168.0.1 > 192.168.0.5: icmp 64: echo reply seq 6

    0.5 pings 0.7
    505: $ ping 192.168.0.7
    PING 192.168.0.7 (192.168.0.7): 56 data bytes
    ping: sendto: Host is down
    ping: sendto: Host is down
    ^C
    --- 192.168.0.7 ping statistics ---
    26 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss

    box5# tcpdump -i rl0 -n
    tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
    listening on rl0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
    ^C
    0 packets captured
    0 packets received by filter
    0 packets dropped by kernel

    0.7 pings 0.1
    17:43:54.077634 IP 192.168.0.7 > 192.168.0.1: ICMP echo request, id 60161, seq 4, length 64
    17:43:54.078336 IP 192.168.0.1 > 192.168.0.7: ICMP echo reply, id 60161, seq 4, length 64
    17:43:55.071703 arp who-has 192.168.0.7 tell 192.168.0.1
    17:43:55.071749 arp reply 192.168.0.7 is-at 00:02:a5:53:cb:3f
    17:43:55.078631 IP 192.168.0.7 > 192.168.0.1: ICMP echo request, id 60161, seq 5, length 64
    17:43:55.079318 IP 192.168.0.1 > 192.168.0.7: ICMP echo reply, id 60161, seq 5, length 64

    0.7 pings 0.5
    17:44:41.459605 arp who-has 192.168.0.5 tell 192.168.0.7
    17:44:41.459818 arp reply 192.168.0.5 is-at 4c:00:10:74:ac:56
    17:44:41.459878 IP 192.168.0.7 > 192.168.0.5: ICMP echo request, id 64257, seq 0, length 64
    17:44:41.460069 IP 192.168.0.5 > 192.168.0.7: ICMP echo reply, id 64257, seq 0, length 64
    17:44:42.460566 IP 192.168.0.7 > 192.168.0.5: ICMP echo request, id 64257, seq 1, length 64
    17:44:42.460731 IP 192.168.0.5 > 192.168.0.7: ICMP echo reply, id 64257, seq 1, length 64

    >
    >Q: Can you eliminate the router/switch combo as a variable by using a
    >cross-over cable, temporarily?
    >
    Cross-over cable? Same as standard network cable? If so is there a special setup?
    Bruce

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Michael Lednev: "Re: portmanager"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: ICMP question
      ... All systems from the same network, ... >is that the ICMP packets coming to my firewall are actually ... >of these pings originate from *.cirn.net. ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • Re: Linux zero IP ID vulnerability?
      ... to perform an idle scan with nmap, ... packets tramitted, 1 packets received, 0% packet loss ... Many people use -P0 w/Idlescan to prevent pings from their true ... from the Linux kernel developers nor from Cisco (other vendors may also be ...
      (Bugtraq)
    • Re: Why is networking so flaky?
      ... either dns or the routes stops working. ... PING 192.168.0.1: 64 byte packets ... the HP-UX system and you get a prompt, or do you mean pings? ...
      (comp.sys.hp.hpux)
    • Re: made my Ultra headless, now its slow
      ... >> Now however logging in through telnet or ssh takes ... >> forever. ... > Trying giving it a series of pings from somewhere else (ping ... 50 packets transmitted, 31 packets received, 38% packet loss ...
      (comp.unix.solaris)
    • where does "Network is unreachable" come from?
      ... Subject says it all-- I'm having trouble getting fc3 configured, ... get packets into or out of the box. ... It does answer pings from other ... To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list ...
      (Fedora)